Randomized trial of lottery-based incentives to improve warfarin adherence

被引:89
作者
Kimmel, Stephen E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Troxel, Andrea B. [1 ,3 ]
Loewenstein, George [3 ,4 ]
Brensinger, Colleen M. [1 ]
Jaskowiak, Jane [1 ]
Doshi, Jalpa A. [2 ,3 ]
Laskin, Mitchell [5 ]
Volpp, Kevin [2 ,3 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Ctr Hlth Incent, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[5] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Pharm Serv, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Philadelphia VA Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Equity Res & Promot, Philadelphia, PA USA
[7] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Hlth Care Management, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE; PATIENT ADHERENCE; RISK-FACTORS; ANTICOAGULATION; MEDICATION; QUALITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2012.05.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Poor adherence to medications is a major cause of morbidity and inadequate drug effectiveness. Efforts to improve adherence have typically been either ineffective or too complex to implement in clinical practice. Lottery-based incentive interventions could be a scalable approach to improving adherence. Methods This was a randomized, controlled clinical trial of a daily lottery-based incentive in patients on warfarin stratified by baseline international normalized ratio (INR). The trial randomized 100 patients to either a lottery-based incentive or no lottery intervention. Main outcome was out-of-range INRs. Results Over 6 months, the overall percentage of out-of-range INRs did not differ between the 2 arms (mean 23.0% in lottery arm and 25.9% in control arm, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.62-1.41). However, among the a priori subgroup with a baseline INR below therapeutic range, there was a significant reduction in out-of-range INR in the lottery arm versus the control arm (adjusted OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.62), whereas there was no such effect among those with therapeutic INRs at baseline (adjusted OR 1.26, 95% CI, 0.76-2.09, P value for interaction = .0016). Among those with low INR at baseline, there was a nonsignificant 49% reduction in the odds of nonadherence with the intervention (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.23-1.14 ). Conclusions Although a lottery-based intervention was not associated with a significant improvement in anticoagulation control among all study participants, it improved control among an a priori group of patients at higher risk for poor adherence. (Am Heart J 2012; 164: 268-74.)
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 274
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   SPECIOUS REWARD - BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF IMPULSIVENESS AND IMPULSE CONTROL [J].
AINSLIE, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1975, 82 (04) :463-496
[2]   Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games [J].
Camerer, C ;
Ho, TH .
ECONOMETRICA, 1999, 67 (04) :827-874
[3]   Regret in economic and psychological theories of choice [J].
Connolly, T ;
Butler, D .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2006, 19 (02) :139-154
[4]   Paying for care episodes and care coordination [J].
Davis, Karen .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (11) :1166-1168
[5]   Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction [J].
Glickman, Seth W. ;
Ou, Fang-Shu ;
DeLong, Elizabeth R. ;
Roe, Matthew T. ;
Lytle, Barbara L. ;
Mulgund, Jyotsna ;
Rumsfeld, John S. ;
Gibler, W. Brian ;
Ohman, E. Magnus ;
Schulman, Kevin A. ;
Peterson, Eric D. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 297 (21) :2373-2380
[6]   Warfarin use among ambulatory patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: The AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) study [J].
Go, AS ;
Hylek, EM ;
Borowsky, LH ;
Phillips, KA ;
Selby, JV ;
Singer, DE .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 131 (12) :927-+
[7]  
Haynes RB, 2001, AM HEART MONOGR S, P3
[8]   The influence of patient adherence on anticoagulation control with warfarin - Results from the International Normalized Ratio Adherence and Genetics (IN-RANGE) Study [J].
Kimmel, Stephen E. ;
Chen, Zhen ;
Price, Maureen ;
Parker, Catherine S. ;
Metlay, Joshua P. ;
Christie, Jason D. ;
Brensinger, Colleen M. ;
Newcomb, Craig W. ;
Samaha, Frederick F. ;
Gross, Robert .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 167 (03) :229-235
[9]  
Kirby K., 2009, J EXP PSYCHOL, V126, P54
[10]   ANOMALIES IN INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE - EVIDENCE AND AN INTERPRETATION [J].
LOEWENSTEIN, G ;
PRELEC, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1992, 107 (02) :573-597