The effect of low glucose degradation product, neutral pH versus standard peritoneal dialysis solutions on peritoneal membrane function: the balANZ trial

被引:72
作者
Johnson, David W. [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Fiona G. [3 ]
Clarke, Margaret [4 ]
Boudville, Neil [5 ]
Elias, Tony J. [6 ]
Foo, Marjorie W. Y. [7 ]
Jones, Bernard [8 ]
Kulkarni, Hemant [9 ]
Langham, Robyn [10 ,11 ]
Ranganathan, Dwarakanathan [2 ,12 ]
Schollum, John [13 ]
Suranyi, Michael G. [14 ]
Tan, Seng H. [15 ,16 ,17 ]
Voss, David [18 ]
机构
[1] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Renal Med, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Monash Med Ctr, Dept Nephrol, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[4] Fresenius Med Care, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, Sch Med & Pharmacol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[6] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Cent No Adelaide Renal & Transplantat Serv, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[7] Singapore Gen Hosp, Singapore 0316, Singapore
[8] John Hunter Hosp, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[9] Fremantle Hosp, Fremantle, WA, Australia
[10] St Vincents Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[11] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[12] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[13] Dunedin Publ Hosp, Dunedin, New Zealand
[14] Liverpool Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[15] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Singapore, Singapore
[16] Changi Gen Hosp, Singapore, Singapore
[17] Mt Elizabeth Med Ctr, SH Tan Kidney & Med Clin, Singapore, Singapore
[18] Middlemore Hosp, Auckland 6, New Zealand
关键词
biocompatibility; glucose degradation products; outcomes; peritoneal dialysis; peritoneal equilibration test; RESIDUAL RENAL-FUNCTION; LONG-TERM; FLUID; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; HEMODIALYSIS; BENEFITS; MORTALITY; TRANSPORT; EXPOSURE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/gfs314
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The balANZ trial recently reported that neutral pH, low glucose degradation product (biocompatible) peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions significantly delayed anuria and reduced peritonitis rates compared with conventional solutions. This article reports a secondary outcome analysis of the balANZ trial with respect to peritoneal membrane function. Adult, incident PD patients with residual renal function were randomized to receive either biocompatible or conventional (control) PD solutions for 2 years. Peritoneal equilibration tests were performed at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Peritoneal small solute clearances and ultra-filtration (UF) were measured at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months. Of the 185 patients recruited into the trial, 85 patients in the Balance group and 82 patients in the control group had peritoneal membrane function evaluated. Mean 4-h dialysate:plasma creatinine ratios (D:P Cr 4h) at 1 month were significantly higher in the Balance group compared with controls (0.67 0.10 versus 0.62 0.10, P 0.002). Over the 2-year study period, mean D:P Cr 4 h measurements remained stable in the Balance group but increased significantly in controls [difference 0.004 per month, 95 confidence interval (95 CI) 0.005 to 0.002, P 0.001]. Similar results were obtained for dialysate glucose ratios (D/D0 glucose). Peritoneal UF was significantly lower in the Balance group than in controls at 3 and 6 months. Over the 2-year study period, peritoneal UF increased significantly in the Balance group but remained stable in controls (difference 24 mL/day/month, 95 CI 939, P 0.002). No differences in peritoneal small solute clearances, prescribed dialysate fill volumes or peritoneal glucose exposure were observed between the two groups. Biocompatible and conventional PD solutions exert differential effects on peritoneal small solute transport rate and UF over time. Adequately powered trials assessing the impact of these differential membrane effects on PD technique and patient survival rates are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:4445 / 4453
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Biocompatible Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions: Do We Have One? [J].
Chaudhary, Kunal ;
Khanna, Ramesh .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 5 (04) :723-732
[2]  
Choi HY, 2008, PERITON DIALYSIS INT, V28, P174
[3]  
Combet S, 2000, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V11, P717, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V114717
[4]   Preserving residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis: volume or biocompatibility? [J].
Davies, Simon J. .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 24 (09) :2620-2622
[5]   Longitudinal relationship between solute transport and ultrafiltration capacity in peritoneal dialysis patients [J].
Davies, SJ .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 66 (06) :2437-2445
[6]  
Davies SJ, 2001, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V12, P1046, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V1251046
[7]   Morphological and functional changes in the dialysed peritoneal cavity: impact of more biocompatible solutions [J].
Devuyst, O ;
Topley, N ;
Williams, JD .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 17 :12-15
[8]  
Dobbie J W, 1994, Perit Dial Int, V14 Suppl 3, pS16
[9]   A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known [J].
Du Bois, D ;
Du Bois, EF .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1916, 17 (06) :863-871
[10]   Randomized controlled study of biocompatible peritoneal dialysis solutions: Effect on residual renal function [J].
Fan, S. L. S. ;
Pile, T. ;
Punzalan, S. ;
Raftery, M. J. ;
Yaqoob, M. M. .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 73 (02) :200-206