Probabilistic flood risk mapping including spatial dependence

被引:110
作者
Neal, Jeffrey [1 ]
Keef, Caroline [2 ]
Bates, Paul [1 ]
Beven, Keith [3 ]
Leedal, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Geog Sci, Bristol BS8 1SS, Avon, England
[2] JBA Consulting, South Barn, Skipton BD23 3AE, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, England
来源
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES | 2013年 / 27卷 / 09期
关键词
flood risk mapping; spatial risk assessment; spatiotemporal extreme dependence; Carlisle; INUNDATION MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; SCALE; METHODOLOGY; CALIBRATION; EVENT;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.9572
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Effective flood risk management depends on methods for estimating flood hazard and an appraisal of the dominant uncertainties in the analysis. Typically, hydraulic models are used to simulate the extent of flooding for an estimate of the flow in a particular reach for a chosen probability of exceedance. However, this definition causes problems at river confluences where flows derive from multiple sources. Here, a model-based approach was adopted to describe the multisite joint distribution of river flows for three rivers that converge on the city of Carlisle (UK). Monte-Carlo methods were used to generate flood events with realistic spatial dependence between tributaries which would occur over a 1000year period. To account for the uncertainty in the data used to create the event set, block bootstrapping was used to produce a further 100 runs of the event generator over notional 1000year periods. Each of the 20000 events created by this process was then simulated using a 10m resolution two-dimensional hydraulic model of the whole city to demonstrate the feasibility of the approach. Spatial dependence was found to be important because no single event caused the maximum flood extent at all locations and assuming perfect correlation between tributaries overestimated flood hazard. Uncertainty in estimates of inundation probability was significant to the extent that confidence intervals in risk estimates were larger than expected; however, the interaction of flows with the flood defences and valley topography gave a distinct structure to the inundation probabilities and risk. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1363
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   A probabilistic modelling system for assessing flood risks [J].
Apel, H ;
Thieken, AH ;
Merz, B ;
Blöschl, G .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2006, 38 (1-2) :79-100
[2]   Uncertainty and equifinality in calibrating distributed roughness coefficients in a flood propagation model with limited data [J].
Aronica, G ;
Hankin, B ;
Beven, K .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1998, 22 (04) :349-365
[3]   Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary pattern information within GLUE [J].
Aronica, G ;
Bates, PD ;
Horritt, MS .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (10) :2001-2016
[4]   A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling [J].
Bates, Paul D. ;
Horritt, Matthew S. ;
Fewtrell, Timothy J. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2010, 387 (1-2) :33-45
[5]  
Beven K., 2011, FRMRC Research Rep. SWP 1, P7
[6]   A limits of acceptability approach to model evaluation and uncertainty estimation in flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation: Skalka catchment, Czech Republic [J].
Blazkova, Sarka ;
Beven, Keith .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2009, 45
[7]  
Clarke D., 2005, GEHO0605BJDBEE ENV A
[8]  
Coles S., 2001, An Introduction to Statistical Modelling of Extreme Values
[9]  
Day AL, 2005, CARLISLE STORMS ASS
[10]   Setting design inflows to hydrodynamic flood models using a dependence model [J].
Faulkner, Duncan ;
Keef, Caroline ;
Martin, John .
HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 43 (05) :663-674