Image reduction pipeline for the detection of variable sources in highly crowded fields

被引:62
作者
Gössl, CA [1 ]
Riffeser, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sternwarte Munchen, D-81679 Munich, Germany
来源
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS | 2002年 / 381卷 / 03期
关键词
methods : data analysis; methods : observational; techniques : image processing; techniques : error propagation; techniques : optimal image subtraction;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361:20011522
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We present a reduction pipeline for CCD (charge-coupled device) images which was built to search for variable sources in highly crowded fields like the M 31 bulge and to handle extensive databases due to large time series. We describe all steps of the standard reduction in detail with emphasis on the realisation of per pixel error propagation: Bias correction, treatment of bad pixels, flatfielding, and filtering of cosmic rays. The problems of conservation of PSF (point spread function) and error propagation in our image alignment procedure as well as the detection algorithm for variable sources are discussed: we build difference images via image convolution with a technique called OIS (optimal image subtraction, Alard & Lupton 1998), proceed with an automatic detection of variable sources in noise dominated images and finally apply a PSF-fitting, relative photometry to the sources found. For the WeCAPP project (Riffeser et al. 2001) we achieve 3sigma detections for variable sources with an apparent brightness of e.g. m = 24.9 mag at their minimum and a variation of Deltam = 2.4 mag (or m = 21.9 mag brightness minimum and a variation of Deltam = 0.6 mag) on a background signal of 18.1 mag/arcsec(2) based on a 500 s exposure with 1.5 arcsec seeing at a 1.2 m telescope. The complete per pixel error propagation allows us to give accurate errors for each measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:1095 / 1109
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   A method for optimal image subtraction [J].
Alard, C ;
Lupton, RH .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 503 (01) :325-331
[2]   Difference image analysis of galactic microlensing. II. Microlensing events [J].
Alcock, C ;
Allsman, RA ;
Alves, D ;
Axelrod, TS ;
Becker, AC ;
Bennett, DP ;
Cook, KH ;
Drake, AJ ;
Freeman, KC ;
Griest, K ;
Lehner, MJ ;
Marshall, SL ;
Minniti, D ;
Peterson, BA ;
Pratt, MR ;
Quinn, PJ ;
Stubbs, CW ;
Sutherland, W ;
Tomaney, A ;
Vandehei, T ;
Welch, DL .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1999, 124 (01) :171-179
[3]   Real-time difference imaging analysis of MOA Galactic bulge observations during 2000 [J].
Bond, IA ;
Abe, F ;
Dodd, RJ ;
Hearnshaw, JB ;
Honda, M ;
Jugaku, J ;
Kilmartin, PM ;
Marles, A ;
Masuda, K ;
Matsubara, Y ;
Muraki, Y ;
Nakamura, T ;
Nankivell, G ;
Noda, S ;
Noguchi, C ;
Ohnishi, K ;
Rattenbury, NJ ;
Reid, M ;
Saito, T ;
Sato, H ;
Sekiguchi, M ;
Skuljan, J ;
Sullivan, DJ ;
Sumi, T ;
Takeuti, M ;
Watase, Y ;
Wilkinson, S ;
Yamada, R ;
Yanagisawa, T ;
Yock, PCM .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 327 (03) :868-880
[4]  
BUIL C, 1991, CCD ASTRONOMY CONSTR, P253
[5]  
Crotts APS, 1999, ASTR SOC P, V182, P409
[6]   The Munich near-infrared cluster survey - I. Field selection, object extraction and photometry [J].
Drory, N ;
Feulner, G ;
Bender, R ;
Botzler, CS ;
Hopp, U ;
Maraston, C ;
de Oliveira, CM ;
Snigula, J .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 325 (02) :550-562
[7]   A novel image reconstruction method applied to deep Hubble Space Telescope images [J].
Fruchter, AS ;
Hook, RN .
APPLICATIONS OF DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING XX, 1997, 3164 :120-125
[8]  
GREISEN EW, 1981, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V264, P298
[9]  
GROSBOL P, 1988, ASTRON ASTROPHYS SUP, V73, P359
[10]  
HARTEN RH, 1988, ASTRON ASTROPHYS SUP, V73, P365