Anticoagulation with bivalirudin for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: The results of the EVOLUTION-OFF study

被引:70
作者
Smedira, NG
Dyke, CM
Koster, A
Jurmann, M
Bhatia, DS
Hu, TF
McCarthy, HL
Lincoff, AM
Spiess, BD
Aronson, S
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[3] Houston NW Med Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[4] Gaston Mem Hosp, Gastonia, NC USA
[5] Deutsch Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[6] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Ctr, VCURES, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.10.049
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Unfractionated heparin has many shortcomings, including indirect and partial inhibition of thrombin, antibody formation, and platelet activation. Bivalirudin, a short- acting direct thrombin inhibitor, avoids these limitations and has superior outcomes during percutaneous revascularization. This trial was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin in off- pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: An open- label, multicenter randomized trial compared heparin with protamine reversal to bivalirudin in patients undergoing off- pump coronary artery bypass. The primary objective was safety as demonstrated by similar rates of procedural success defined as freedom from a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization. Twenty- one institutions randomized 105 patients to receive bivalirudin and 52 patients to receive heparin. Results: The mean age was 65 years for both groups. The bivalirudin group had more grafts: 3.0 +/- 1 versus 2.5 +/- 1. Procedural success rates at 30 days were identical in bivalirudin- and heparin- treated patients ( 93%). Operative times, total blood loss, reoperations for bleeding, and major adverse events were not significantly different. Strokes were more frequent in the heparin group: 5.5% versus 0; P = .05. Mortality was 2% in each group. Repeat revascularization was required in 3% of bivalirudin- and 2% of the heparin- treated patients. Conclusions: For patients undergoing off- pump coronary artery bypass grafting, bivalirudin was an effective anticoagulant, without excessive bleeding and with a safety profile similar to that of heparin. Further trials are warranted to assess whether anticoagulation with bivalirudin improves clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 692
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials [J].
Angelini, GD ;
Taylor, FC ;
Reeves, BC ;
Ascione, R .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9313) :1194-1199
[2]   Bivalrudin use in off-pump myocardial revascularization in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia [J].
Bott, JN ;
Reddy, K ;
Krick, S .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 76 (01) :273-275
[3]   A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery [J].
Khan, NE ;
De Souza, A ;
Mister, R ;
Flather, M ;
Clague, J ;
Davies, S ;
Collins, P ;
Wang, DL ;
Sigwart, U ;
Pepper, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (01) :21-28
[4]   Effectiveness of Bivalirudin as a replacement for heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting [J].
Koster, A ;
Spiess, B ;
Chew, DP ;
Krabatsch, T ;
Tambeur, L ;
DeAnda, A ;
Hetzer, R ;
Kuppe, H ;
Smedira, NG ;
Lincoff, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 93 (03) :356-359
[5]   Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention - REPLACE-2 Randomized Trial [J].
Lincoff, AM ;
Bittl, JA ;
Harrington, RA ;
Feit, F ;
Kleiman, NS ;
Jackman, JD ;
Sarembock, IJ ;
Cohen, DJ ;
Spriggs, D ;
Ebrahimi, R ;
Keren, G ;
Carr, J ;
Cohen, EA ;
Betriu, A ;
Desmet, W ;
Kereiakes, DJ ;
Rutsch, W ;
Wilcox, RG ;
de Feyter, PJ ;
Vahanian, A ;
Topol, EJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (07) :853-863
[6]   Bivalirudin versus heparin and protamine in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery [J].
Merry, AF ;
Raudkivi, PJ ;
Middleton, NG ;
McDougall, JM ;
Nand, P ;
Mills, BP ;
Webber, BJ ;
Frampton, CM ;
White, HD .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 77 (03) :925-931
[7]   Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: A prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting [J].
Puskas, JD ;
Williams, WH ;
Duke, PG ;
Staples, JR ;
Glas, KE ;
Marshall, JJ ;
Leimbach, M ;
Huber, P ;
Garas, S ;
Sammons, BH ;
McCall, SA ;
Petersen, RJ ;
Bailey, DE ;
Chu, H ;
Mahoney, EM ;
Weintraub, WS ;
Guyton, RA .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 125 (04) :797-808
[8]   Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting - Numerous studies but few conclusions - A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia in Collaboration with the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research [J].
Sellke, FW ;
Dimaio, JM ;
Caplan, LR ;
Ferguson, TB ;
Gardner, TJ ;
Hiratzka, LF ;
Isselbacher, EM ;
Lytle, BW ;
Mack, MJ ;
Murkin, JM ;
Robbins, RC .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 111 (21) :2858-2864
[9]   Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery - Results from a randomized study [J].
van Dijk, D ;
Nierich, AP ;
Jansen, EWL ;
Nathoe, HM ;
Suyker, WJL ;
Diephuis, JC ;
van Boven, WJ ;
Borst, C ;
Buskens, E ;
Grobbee, DE ;
de Medina, EOR ;
de Jaegere, PPT .
CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (15) :1761-1766