Developmental autonomy and somatic niche construction promotes robust cell fate decisions

被引:3
作者
Bershad, Anya K. [1 ,2 ]
Fuentes, Miguel A. [1 ,3 ]
Krakauer, David C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Santa Fe Inst, Santa Fe, NM 87501 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Inst Balseiro, Ctr Atom Bariloche, RA-8400 San Carlos De Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina
关键词
evodevo; signaling; theory; math; hierarchical selection;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.05.018
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 [理学]; 0710 [生物学]; 09 [农学];
摘要
During the course of development cells undergo division producing a variety of cell types. Proliferation and differentiation are dependent on both genetic programs, encoded by the cellular genome, and environmental cues produced by the local cellular environment imposing local selection pressures on cells. We explore the role that cellular signals play over a large range of potential parameter regimes, in minimizing developmental error: errors in differentiation where an inappropriate proportion of differentiated daughter cells are generated. We find that trophic factors produced by the Population of dividing cells can compensate for increased error rates when signals act through a form of positive feedback-survival signals. We operationalize these signals as the somatic niche and refer to their production as somatic niche construction. We find that tissue development switches to an autonomous state, independent of cellular signals, when errors are unmanageably high or density regulation is very strong. A signal-selective regime-strong niche dependence-is favored at low to intermediate error, assuming compartmentalized density dependence. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 416
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]
Autonomy of cell proliferation and developmental programs during Arabidopsis aboveground organ morphogenesis [J].
Bemis, Shannon M. ;
Torii, Keiko U. .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 304 (01) :367-381
[2]
Buss L. W., 1987, EVOLUTION INDIVIDUAL
[3]
Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system [J].
Colman-Lerner, A ;
Gordon, A ;
Serra, E ;
Chin, T ;
Resnekov, O ;
Endy, D ;
Pesce, CG ;
Brent, R .
NATURE, 2005, 437 (7059) :699-706
[4]
de Visser J. A. G. M., 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P1959, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.0014-3820.2003.TB00377.X
[5]
Self-renewal, differentiation or death: regulation and manipulation of hematopoietic stem cell fate [J].
Domen, J ;
Weissman, IL .
MOLECULAR MEDICINE TODAY, 1999, 5 (05) :201-208
[6]
Of lineage and legacy: the development of mammalian hematopoietic stem cells [J].
Dzierzak, Elaine ;
Speck, Nancy A. .
NATURE IMMUNOLOGY, 2008, 9 (02) :129-136
[7]
Progression from extrinsic to intrinsic signaling in cell fate specification: A view from the nervous system [J].
Edlund, T ;
Jessell, TM .
CELL, 1999, 96 (02) :211-224
[8]
Proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in cancer [J].
Evan, GI ;
Vousden, KH .
NATURE, 2001, 411 (6835) :342-348
[9]
Ferrell JE, 1999, BIOESSAYS, V21, P866, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199910)21:10<866::AID-BIES9>3.0.CO
[10]
2-1