Do property values rebound from environmental stigmas? Evidence from Dallas

被引:72
作者
Dale, L [1 ]
Murdoch, JC
Thayer, MA
Waddell, PA
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Law & Econ Consulting Grp, Sch Social Sci, Dallas, TX 75230 USA
[2] San Diego State Univ, Dept Econ, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Grad Sch Publ Affairs, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3147013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Dallas area housing market is examined before, during, and after the closure and cleanup of a 50-year-old lead smelter, west of downtown Dallas, using a pooled time series and cross-sectional data set that covered all single-family homes sold through the multiple-listing service from 1979 through 1995-over 200,000 observations. Consistent with the existing literature, property values around the smelter were lower before the cleanup. However, after the cleanup, the prices consistently rebounded across all neighborhood types, although the areas that were nearest and poorest did so more slowly. (JEL Q20).
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 326
页数:16
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   A BAYESIAN-APPROACH TO ASSESSING THE ROBUSTNESS OF HEDONIC PROPERTY VALUE STUDIES [J].
ATKINSON, SE ;
CROCKER, TD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 1987, 2 (01) :27-45
[2]   THE ESTIMATION OF DEMAND PARAMETERS IN HEDONIC PRICE MODELS [J].
BARTIK, TJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1987, 95 (01) :81-88
[3]   A TEST OF THE EXPECTED UTILITY MODEL - EVIDENCE FROM EARTHQUAKE RISKS [J].
BROOKSHIRE, DS ;
THAYER, MA ;
TSCHIRHART, J ;
SCHULZE, WD .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1985, 93 (02) :369-389
[5]  
Freeman A.M., 1979, BENEFITS ENV IMPROVE
[6]   THE ROBUSTNESS OF HEDONIC PRICE ESTIMATION - URBAN AIR-QUALITY [J].
GRAVES, P ;
MURDOCH, JC ;
THAYER, MA ;
WALDMAN, D .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1988, 64 (03) :220-233
[7]  
GREGORY R, 1995, AM SCI, V83, P220
[9]   THE EFFECT OF AN INCINERATOR SITING ON HOUSING APPRECIATION RATES [J].
KIEL, KA ;
MCCLAIN, KT .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1995, 37 (03) :311-323
[10]   THE IMPACT OF TOXIC-WASTE SITES ON HOUSING VALUES [J].
KOHLHASE, JE .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1991, 30 (01) :1-26