Microdroplet fluorochromatic assay for the enumeration of white cells (WBCs) in WBC-reduced blood components: Validation and application for evaluating newly developed WBC-reduction filters

BACKGROUND: Sensitive and accurate counting methods are required to assess the residual white cells (WBCs) in WBC-reduced blood components. The Nageotte hemocytometer, widely used for this purpose, is cumbersome, and its efficacy is dependent upon the skill of the operator. The performance of a simple fluorochromatic assay using tissue-typing microdroplet trays is presented here. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Undiluted samples of blood components were mixed with a fluorochromatic dye in trays. WBCs were counted under an epifluorescence microscope. The accuracy and sensitivity of this method were compared with those of the reference Nageotte hemocytometer method by using serial dilution of samples of platelets and red cells containing known concentrations of WBCs and by calculating the standard curves. The Nageotte hemocytometer and the microdroplet fluorochromatic assay (MFA) were also compared in terms of count correlation and reproducibility in 320 paired counts of plateletpheresis samples. MFA was used to evaluate a newly developed WBC-reduction red cell filter. RESULTS: The MFA for platelets and red cells was linear to 0.1 and 0.03 WBCs per mu L, respectively The linear regression line of log(10) MFA versus log(10) Nageotte method had a slope of 0.963, intercept of -0.04, and r(2) of 0.968. The Nageotte method gave an estimation of WBC content 12 to 20 percent greater than that of the MFA. The MFA, with a larger neat sample volume, showed precision comparable to that of the Nageotte method. The filter demonstrated a median WBC reduction of 4.8 log(10). CONCLUSION: The MFA is a sensitive and accurate method for quality control processes to assess the residual WBCs in WBC-reduced blood components.