Preoperative evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

被引:57
作者
Parsons, Colin M. [1 ]
Sutcliffe, Julie L. [2 ]
Bold, Richard J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Davis Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Sacramento, Dept Biomed Engn, Sacramento, CA 95819 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY | 2008年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
pancreatic cancer; preoperative imaging; PET scan; tumor markers;
D O I
10.1007/s00534-007-1240-7
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The preoperative evaluation of resectability for pancreatic cancer fails to identify up to 25% of patients who are unfortunately found to be unresectable at surgical exploration. Inoperative findings in this circumstance is usually due to either small volume metastatic disease or regional tumor invasion. While advances in computed tomography (CT) technology has increased accuracy of local tumor extent, occult metastatic disease remains a common problem. Although 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been demonstrated to be useful in the staging of many malignancies (e.g. esophageal cancer, recurrent colorectal cancer, lung cancer), it has not been found to significantly increase the accuracy of determining resectability preoperatively in pancreatic cancer, especially with regard to detection of small volume metastatic disease. There are a variety of pancreatic cancer-specific antigens which are being developed as a method for targeted molecular imaging; we provide preliminary data targeting the integrin alpha(v)beta(6) to demonstrate the potential feasibility of this approach. Further developments may allow the accurate determination of patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, and more importantly, those with unresectable disease that may forego unnecessary surgery, the associated morbidity, and the subsequent delay of appropriate therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 435
页数:7
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Quantification in PET [J].
Acton, PD ;
Zhuang, HM ;
Alavi, A .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 42 (06) :1055-+
[2]   A CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF MONOCLONAL (CA19-9, CA50, CA12-5) AND POLYCLONAL (CEA, TPA) ANTIBODY-DEFINED ANTIGENS FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF PANCREATIC-CANCER [J].
BENINI, L ;
CAVALLINI, G ;
ZORDAN, D ;
RIZZOTTI, P ;
RIGO, L ;
BROCCO, G ;
PEROBELLI, L ;
ZANCHETTA, M ;
PEDERZOLI, P ;
SCURO, LA .
PANCREAS, 1988, 3 (01) :61-66
[3]   Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and determining resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma -: A meta-analysis [J].
Bipat, S ;
Phoa, SSKS ;
van Delden, OM ;
Bossuyt, PMM ;
Gouma, DJ ;
Laméris, JS ;
Stoker, J .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2005, 29 (04) :438-445
[4]  
BROWN RS, 1993, CANCER, V72, P2979, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19931115)72:10<2979::AID-CNCR2820721020>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-X
[6]  
Callery M, 2000, J GASTROINTEST SURG, V4, P238
[7]  
Cerwenka H, 1997, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V44, P1117
[8]   Preoperative imaging of pancreatic cancer: A management-oriented approach [J].
Clarke, DL ;
Thomson, SR ;
Madiba, TE ;
Sanyika, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2003, 196 (01) :119-129
[9]   The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy [J].
Conlon, KC ;
Dougherty, E ;
Klimstra, DS ;
Coit, DG ;
Turnbull, ADM ;
Brennan, MF .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1996, 223 (02) :134-140
[10]  
Delbeke D, 1999, J NUCL MED, V40, P1784