A comparison in individual murine tumors of techniques for measuring oxygen levels

被引:47
作者
Kavanagh, MC
Tsang, V
Chow, S
Koch, C
Hedley, D
Minkin, S
Hill, RP
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp, Ontario Canc Inst, Div Expt Therapeut, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Princess Margaret Hosp, Ontario Canc Inst, Div Epidemiol & Stat, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1999年 / 44卷 / 05期
关键词
tumor; hypoxia; polarographic sensor; EF5; comet assay;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00104-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the relationship between different techniques for measuring oxygen levels in a murine tumor model. Methods and Materials: Using the murine fibrosarcoma line KHT-C, five techniques of measuring oxygen levels-the Eppendorf pO(2), Histograph, EFS binding, the comet assay, a paired survival assay, and an in vivo growth delay assay-were assessed. In these experiments, three or more techniques were applied in different combinations to measure the oxygen levels in individual tumors. Results: Statistically significant correlations were observed between the hypoxic proportions calculated from the paired survival assay with those from EF5 binding. The comet assay was found to have a statistically significant correlation with the paired survival analysis and the growth delay analysis. No statistically significant correlation was found between the Eppendorf pO(2), Histograph measurements and those from the other techniques, although there were weak correlations with the paired survival assay and EF5 binding. For technical reasons, a comparison was not made between EF5 binding and the growth delay assay, Conclusions: The correlations found between EF5 binding and the comet assay with the radiobiological assays suggest that these techniques have potential for predicting outcome following radiation treatment. The lack of correlation seen between the pO(2), Histograph data and the radiobiological assays is in contrast to results from early clinical trials. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1137 / 1146
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   COMPARISON BETWEEN INVITRO RADIOSENSITIVITY AND INVIVO RADIORESPONSE OF MURINE TUMOR-CELL LINES .1. PARAMETERS OF INVITRO RADIOSENSITIVITY AND ENDOGENOUS CELLULAR GLUTATHIONE LEVELS [J].
BRISTOW, RG ;
HARDY, PA ;
HILL, RP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 18 (01) :133-145
[2]   COMPARISON BETWEEN INVITRO RADIOSENSITIVITY AND INVIVO RADIORESPONSE IN MURINE TUMOR-CELL LINES .2. INVIVO RADIORESPONSE FOLLOWING FRACTIONATED TREATMENT AND INVITRO INVIVO CORRELATIONS [J].
BRISTOW, RG ;
HILL, RP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 18 (02) :331-345
[3]  
Brizel DM, 1996, CANCER RES, V56, P941
[4]   Tumor hypoxia adversely affects the prognosis of carcinoma of the head and neck [J].
Brizel, DM ;
Sibley, GS ;
Prosnitz, LR ;
Scher, RL ;
Dewhirst, MW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 38 (02) :285-289
[5]   QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENTS OF OXYGEN TENSION IN NORMAL TISSUES AND IN THE TUMOURS OF PATIENTS BEFORE AND AFTER RADIOTHERAPY [J].
CATER, DB ;
SILVER, IA .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 1960, 53 (03) :233-256
[6]   CORRELATION BETWEEN THE RADIOBIOLOGICAL OXYGEN CONSTANT, K, AND THE NON-PROTEIN SULFHYDRYL CONTENT OF MAMMALIAN-CELLS [J].
CULLEN, BM ;
MICHALOWSKI, A ;
WALKER, HC ;
REVESZ, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1980, 38 (05) :525-535
[7]  
DEJAEGER K, IN PRESS INT J RAD O
[8]   THE EFFECT OF OXYGEN BREATHING AND RADIOTHERAPY UPON THE TISSUE OXYGEN TENSION OF SOME HUMAN TUMOURS [J].
EVANS, NTS ;
NAYLOR, PFD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1963, 36 (426) :418-425
[9]  
Evans SM, 1996, CANCER RES, V56, P405
[10]   Oxygenation predicts radiation response and survival in patients with cervix cancer [J].
Fyles, AW ;
Milosevic, M ;
Wong, R ;
Kavanagh, MC ;
Pintilie, M ;
Sun, A ;
Chapman, W ;
Levin, W ;
Manchul, L ;
Keane, TJ ;
Hill, RP .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 48 (02) :149-156