A comprehensive model for familial breast cancer incorporating BRCA1, BRCA2 and other genes

被引:348
作者
Antoniou, AC
Pharoah, PDP
McMullan, G
Day, NE
Stratton, MR
Peto, J
Ponder, BJ
Easton, DF
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Strangeways Res Lab, Inst Publ Hlth, CRC Genet Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, CRC Human Canc Genet Res Grp, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cavendish Lab, High Performance Comp Facil, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
[5] Inst Canc Res, Surrey, England
关键词
segregation analysis; BRCA3; Polygenes; high-risk families; population studies;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6600008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In computing the probability that a woman is a BRCA1 or BRCA2 carrier for genetic counselling purposes, it is important to allow for the fact that other breast cancer susceptibility genes may exist. We used data from both a population based series of breast cancer cases and high risk families in the UK, with information on BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status, to invest gate the genetic models that can best explain familial breast cancer outside BRCA1 and BRCA2 families. We also evaluated the evidence for risk modifiers in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, We estimated the simultaneous effects of BRCA1. BRCA2, a third hypothetical gene 'BRCA3', and a polygenic effect using segregation analysis. The hypergeometric polygenic model was used to approximate polygenic inheritance and the effect of risk modifiers, BRCA1 and BRCA2 could not explain all the observed familial clustering. The best fitting model for the residual familial breast cancer was the polygenic, although a model with a single recessive allele produced a similar fit. There was also significant evidence for a modifying effect of other genes on the risks of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Under this model, the frequency of BRCA1 was estimated to be 0.051% (95% CI: 0.021-0.125%) and of BRCA2 0.068% (95% CI: 0.033-0.141%). The breast cancer risk by age 70 years, based on the average incidence over all modifiers was estimated to be 35.3% for BRCA1 and 50.3% for BRCA2. The corresponding ovarian cancer risks were 25.9% for BRCA1 and 9.1% for BRCA2. The Findings suggest that several common, low penetrance genes with multiplicative effects, on risk may account for the residual non-BRCA1/2 familial aggregation of breast cancer. The modifying effect may explain the previously reported differences between population based estimates for BRCA1/2 penetrance and estimates based on high-risk families.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 83
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION
    AKAIKE, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) : 716 - 723
  • [2] Antoniou AC, 2000, GENET EPIDEMIOL, V18, P173
  • [3] Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population-based study
    Antoniou, AC
    Pharoah, PDP
    McMullan, G
    Day, NE
    Ponder, BAJ
    Easton, D
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 21 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [4] CLAUS EB, 1991, AM J HUM GENET, V48, P232
  • [5] After BRCA1 and BRCA2-what next? Multifactorial segregation analyses of three-generation, population-based Australian families affected by female breast cancer
    Cui, JS
    Antoniou, AC
    Dite, GS
    Southey, MC
    Venter, DJ
    Easton, DF
    Giles, GG
    McCredie, MRE
    Hopper, JL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2001, 68 (02) : 420 - 431
  • [6] No association between a polymorphism in the steroid metabolism gene CYP17 and risk of breast cancer
    Dunning, AM
    Healey, CS
    Pharoah, PDP
    Foster, NA
    Lipscombe, JM
    Redman, KL
    Easton, DF
    Day, NE
    Ponder, BAJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 77 (11) : 2045 - 2047
  • [7] How many more breast cancer predisposition genes are there?
    Douglas F Easton
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 1 (1)
  • [8] EASTON DF, 1995, AM J HUM GENET, V56, P265
  • [9] CANCER RISKS IN A-T HETEROZYGOTES
    EASTON, DF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1994, 66 (06) : S177 - S182
  • [10] EASTON DF, 1993, AM J HUM GENET, V52, P678