Universal standardization of forearm bone densitometry

被引:38
作者
Shepherd, JA
Cheng, XG
Lu, Y
Njeh, C
Toschke, J
Engelke, K
Grigorian, M
Genant, HK
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, Osteoporosis & Arthrit Res Grp, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Med Phys, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; digital X-ray radiogrammetry; cross-calibration; osteoporosis; peripheral;
D O I
10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.4.734
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
As part of an effort to quantify device-dependent differences in forearm bone density, 101 women, aged 20-80 years (similar to16 women in each age decade), were scanned on six forearm bone densitometers: the Aloka DCS-600EX, the Hologic QDR-4500A, the Lunar PIXI, the Norland pDEXA, the Osteometer DTX-200, and the Pronosco X-posure System. Regression statistics are reported for all similar regions of interest (ROIs). However, comparisons were confounded because of large differences in the ROI size and placement. The number of ROIs reported for a single scan by each device varied from I to 12. The correlation coefficients ranged from 0.7 < r < 0.97, with the highest correlation coefficients and lowest SEs for comparisons between the most similar ROIs. Standardized units of bone mineral density are derived for distal (sdBMD), mid(smBMD), and proximal (spBMD) ROIs that allow for comparable mean bone densities to be derived for patient populations. Five phantoms were scanned and characterized on five of the devices and the precision and mean values were reported. These phantom values will aid in the in vitro cross-calibration between manufacturers to recreate the presented in vivo relationships. Care should be exercised when using these equations for cross-calibrating patient databases or pooling clinical data from different devices because the least significant differences detectable from measurements taken on two different machines can be increased substantially.
引用
收藏
页码:734 / 745
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
*AL CO LTD, AL DCS 600EX OWN MAN
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Cross-calibration of a fan-beam X-ray densitometer with a pencil-beam system [J].
Bouyoucef, SE ;
Cullum, ID ;
Jell, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (822) :522-531
[4]   A single bone density measurement can predict fractures over 25 years [J].
Duppe, H ;
Gardsell, P ;
Nilsson, B .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 60 (02) :171-174
[5]   DENSITOMETRY OF THE RADIUS USING SINGLE AND DUAL-ENERGY ABSORPTIOMETRY [J].
FAULKNER, KG ;
MCCLUNG, MR ;
SCHMEER, MS ;
ROBERTS, LA ;
GAITHER, KW .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 54 (03) :208-211
[6]  
*GE LUN, LUN PIXI OWN MAN, P32
[7]  
GENANT HK, 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, P1503
[8]   Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques [J].
Glüer, CC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1999, 14 (11) :1952-1962
[9]  
HAGIWARA S, 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, P1425
[10]   Untitled [J].
Hanson, J ;
Felsenberg, D ;
Fuerst, T ;
Lu, Y ;
Genant, HK ;
Hangartner, T ;
Harrold, L ;
Johnston, CC ;
Kalender, WA ;
Mazess, R ;
Nord, R ;
Miller, PD ;
Morita, R ;
Nakamura, A ;
Tamegai, T ;
Reeve, J ;
Schiessl, H ;
TysarczykNiemeyer, G ;
Steiger, P ;
Stein, J ;
vonStetten, E .
BONE, 1997, 21 (04) :369-370