Return visits to a pediatric emergency department

被引:98
作者
Alessandrini, EA [1 ]
Lavelle, JM [1 ]
Grenfell, SM [1 ]
Jacobstein, CR [1 ]
Shaw, KN [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Pediat,Div Pediat Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
emergency medical services; quality improvement; utilization review;
D O I
10.1097/01.pec.0000117924.65522.a1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine the incidence of return visits (RVs), types of RVs, and factors associated with RVs to a pediatric emergency department (ED). Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients seen in an urban, tertiary care pediatric ED. Main outcome: RV within 48 hours, identified from a computerized log. Results: The total RV rate was 3.5% (95% confidence interval, 3.3-3.6), similar to rates (2.4% to 3.4%) reported in general EDs. Most (78.5%) RVs were unscheduled, 17% were scheduled, and 4% were called back to the ED. Infectious disease (45%), respiratory (16%), and trauma (16%) accounted for most RV diagnoses. When compared with the overall ED population, RV patients were more likely to be younger than 2 years [relative risk, 1.3 (1.2-1.4)], to be admitted to the hospital [relative risk, 1.3 (1.2-1.5)], and to be triaged as acute [relative risk, 1.1 (1.0-1.2)]. Patients called back to the ED were younger, more likely to be triaged as acute, and more likely to be admitted than other RV patients. Significant diagnoses were made at RV in 7 (0.4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.7) patients, half of whom were called back to the ED or had a scheduled RV. Conclusion: Similarities between our pediatric ED RV rate and other published research implies that benchmarking and quality improvement tools for RV can be used and compared in both pediatric and general EDs. Focusing on systems to call patients back to the ED when necessary may be an efficient way to reduce medical error and adverse patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 171
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Effects of medicaid managed care on health care use: Infant emergency department and ambulatory services
    Alessandrini, EA
    Shaw, KN
    Bilker, WB
    Perry, KA
    Baker, MD
    Schwarz, DF
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2001, 108 (01) : 103 - 110
  • [2] Analysis of pediatric hospitalizations after emergency department release as a quality improvement tool
    DePiero, AD
    Ochsenschlager, DW
    Chamberlain, JM
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 39 (02) : 159 - 163
  • [3] Initial emergency department diagnosis and return visits: Risk versus perception
    Gordon, JA
    An, LC
    Hayward, RA
    Williams, BC
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 32 (05) : 569 - 573
  • [4] EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT REVISITS
    KEITH, KD
    BOCKA, JJ
    KOBERNICK, MS
    KROME, RL
    ROSS, MA
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1989, 18 (09) : 964 - 968
  • [5] LERMAN B, 1987, Journal of Emergency Medicine, V5, P359, DOI 10.1016/0736-4679(87)90138-7
  • [6] LETOURNEAU M, 1990, AM J DIS CHILD, V144, P445
  • [7] A pediatric emergency department follow-up system: Completing the cycle of care
    O'Neill, KA
    Silvestri, A
    Mcdaniel-Yakscoe, N
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2001, 17 (05) : 392 - 395
  • [8] PARRISH FC, 2000, ANN EMERG MED, V36, pS31
  • [9] BOUNCES - AN ANALYSIS OF SHORT-TERM RETURN VISITS TO A PUBLIC HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    PIERCE, JM
    KELLERMAN, AL
    OSTER, C
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1990, 19 (07) : 752 - 757
  • [10] Weinstock B., 1993, AM J DIS CHILD, V147, P425