Personality, lifestyle, and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer:: follow-up of population based cohort

被引:85
作者
Stürmer, T [1 ]
Hasselbach, P
Amelang, M
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Prevent Med, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[3] Univ Heidelberg, Dept Psychol, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
来源
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2006年 / 332卷 / 7554期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.38833.479560.80
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To study the relation between measures of personality and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in a large cohort. Design Follow-up of population based cohort. Setting Heidelberg, Germany. Participants 5114 women and men aged 40-65 in 1992-5. Main outcome measures Psychological traits assessed by several standardised personality questionnaires in 1992-5, related to cause of death (to 2002-3) or reported incidence of cardiovascular diseases and cancer (validated by treating doctors). Relative risks (and 95% confidence intervals) for combined morbidity and mortality according to five important personality traits were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results During median follow-up of 8.5 years, 257 participants died and 72 participants were diagnosed with a heart attack, 62 with stroke, and 240 with cancer. (morbidity and mortality combined). A high internal locus of control over disease was associated with a decreased risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted relative risk for an increase of 1 SD = 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 0.96). An increase of 1 SD in time urgency was associated with a decreased risk of cancer (adjusted relative risk 0.83; 0.73 to 0.95). Other major personality traits-anger control, psychoticism, and symptoms of depression-were not consistently associated with myocardial infarction, stroke, or cancer. Conclusion Internal locus of control over disease and time urgency seem to be associated with reduced risk for common chronic diseases, probably by affecting unmeasured health related behaviour. The other personality traits assessed had no major impact on cardiovascular disease and cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1359 / 1362
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Z GESUNDHEITSPSYOLOG
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SAGE HDB HLTH PSYCHO
[3]   Stress, inflammation and cardiovascular disease [J].
Black, PH ;
Garbutt, LD .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2002, 52 (01) :1-23
[4]   Genetic and environmental influences on observed personality: Evidence from the German observational study of adult twins [J].
Borkenau, P ;
Riemann, R ;
Angleitner, A ;
Spinath, FM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 80 (04) :655-668
[5]   Is health protective behaviour in adolescents related to personality? A study of sun protective behaviour and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (junior version) in Queensland [J].
Brayne, C ;
Do, KA ;
Green, L ;
Green, AC .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1998, 25 (05) :889-895
[6]   Epidemiological evidence for a relationship between life events, coping style, and personality factors in the development of breast cancer [J].
Butow, PN ;
Hiller, JE ;
Price, MA ;
Thackway, SV ;
Kricker, A ;
Tennant, CC .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2000, 49 (03) :169-181
[7]   The relationship of type A behavior and its components to all-cause mortality in an elderly subgroup of men from the Western Collaborative Group Study [J].
Carmelli, D ;
Swan, GE .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1996, 40 (05) :475-483
[8]   The association between stressful life events and breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis [J].
Duijts, SFA ;
Zeegers, MPA ;
Van der Borne, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 107 (06) :1023-1029
[9]   Psychological factors and cancer development: Evidence after 30 years of research [J].
Garssen, B .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2004, 24 (03) :315-338
[10]   Methods to evaluate risks for composite end points and their individual components [J].
Glynn, RJ ;
Rosner, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 57 (02) :113-122