Effects of the timing and identity of retrieval cues in individual recall: An attempt to mimic cross-cueing in collaborative recall

被引:25
作者
Andersson, J [1 ]
Hitch, G
机构
[1] FOI, Div Command & Control, Dept Man Syst Interact, SE-58111 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YW, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09658210444000557
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Inhibitory effects in collaborative recall have been attributed to cross-cueing among partners, in the same way that part-set cues are known to impair recall in individuals. However, studies of part-set cueing in individuals typically involve presenting cues visually at the start of recall, whereas cross-cueing in collaboration is likely to be spoken and distributed over time. In an attempt to bridge this gap, three experiments investigated effects of presenting spoken part-set or extra-list cues at different times during individual recall. Cues had an inhibitory effect on recollection in the early part of the recall period, especially when presented in immediate succession at the start of recall. There was no difference between the effects of part-set and extra-list cues under these presentation conditions. However, more inhibition was generated by part-set than extra-list cues when cue presentation was distributed throughout recall. These results are interpreted as suggesting that cues presented during recall disrupt memory in two ways, corresponding to either blocking or modifying retrieval processes. Implications for explaining and possibly ameliorating inhibitory effects in collaborative recall are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 103
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ALLEN S, 1970, FREQUENCY DICT PRESE
[2]   Cued memory collaboration: Effects of friendship and type of retrieval cue [J].
Andersson, J ;
Ronnberg, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 9 (03) :273-287
[3]   RECALL SUFFERS FROM COLLABORATION - JOINT RECALL EFFECTS OF FRIENDSHIP AND TASK COMPLEXITY [J].
ANDERSSON, J ;
RONNBERG, J .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 9 (03) :199-211
[4]  
Andersson J, 1996, APPL COGNITIVE PSYCH, V10, P171, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199604)10:2<171::AID-ACP385>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-D
[6]   Net effect of memory collaboration: How is collaboration affected by factors such as friendship, gender and age? [J].
Andersson, J .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 42 (04) :367-375
[7]   A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? [J].
Basden, BH ;
Basden, DR ;
Bryner, S ;
Thomas, RL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1997, 23 (05) :1176-1191
[8]   INHIBITION WITH PART-LIST CUING - SOME TESTS OF ITEM STRENGTH HYPOTHESIS [J].
BASDEN, DR ;
BASDEN, BH ;
GALLOWAY, BC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY, 1977, 3 (01) :100-108
[9]   SOME TESTS OF THE STRATEGY DISRUPTION INTERPRETATION OF PART-LIST CUEING INHIBITION [J].
BASDEN, DR ;
BASDEN, BH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1995, 21 (06) :1656-1669
[10]   PRODUCTIVITY LOSS IN IDEA-GENERATING GROUPS - TRACKING DOWN THE BLOCKING EFFECT [J].
DIEHL, M ;
STROEBE, W .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (03) :392-403