A review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments

被引:211
作者
Lofland, JH
Pizzi, L
Frick, KD
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Off Hlth Policy & Clin Outcomes, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Hlth Serv Res & Dev, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-200422030-00003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The objective of this review was to identify health-related workplace productivity loss survey instruments, with particular emphasis on those that capture a metric suitable for direct translation into a monetary figure. A literature search using Medline, HealthSTAR, PsycINFO and Econlit databases between 1966 and 2002, and a telephone-administered survey of business leaders and researchers, were conducted to identify health-related workplace productivity measurement survey instruments. This review was conducted from the societal perspective. Each identified instrument was reviewed for the following: (i) reliability; (ii) content validity; (iii) construct validity; (iv) criterion validity; (v) productivity metric(s); (vi) instrument scoring technique; (vii) suitability for direct translation into a monetary figure; (viii) number of items; (ix) mode(s) of administration; and (x) disease state(s) in which it had been tested. Reliability and validity testing have been performed for 8 of the 11 identified surveys. Of the 11 instruments identified, six captured metrics that are suitable for direct translation into a monetary figure. Of those six, one instrument measured absenteeism, while the other five measured both absenteeism and presenteeism. All of the identified instruments except for one were available as paper, self-administered questionnaires and many were available in languages other than English. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the published, peer-reviewed survey instruments available to measure health-related workplace productivity loss. As the field of productivity measurement matures, tools may be developed that will allow researchers to accurately calculate lost productivity costs when performing cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses. Using data captured by these instruments, society and healthcare decision makers will be able to make better informed decisions concerning the value of the medications, disease management and health promotion programmes that individuals receive.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 184
页数:20
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], QUALITY LIFE PHARMAC
[2]   How to calculate indirect costs in economic evaluations [J].
Brouwer, WBF ;
Koopmanschap, MA .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1998, 13 (05) :563-566
[3]  
Burton W N, 1999, Bus Health, V17, P34
[4]   The role of health risk factors and disease on worker productivity [J].
Burton, WN ;
Conti, DJ ;
Chen, CY ;
Schultz, AB ;
Edington, DW .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1999, 41 (10) :863-877
[5]  
Burton WN., 1998, Dis Manag, V1, P17, DOI DOI 10.1089/DIS.1998.1.17
[6]   Validation of a migraine work and productivity loss questionnaire for use in migraine studies [J].
Davies, GM ;
Santanello, N ;
Gerth, W ;
Lerner, D ;
Block, GA .
CEPHALALGIA, 1999, 19 (05) :497-502
[7]  
DELISSOVOY G, 1994, NEUROLOGY, V44, P56
[8]  
Endicott J, 1997, PSYCHOPHARMACOL BULL, V33, P13
[9]   The economic burden of migraine to society [J].
Ferrari, MD .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1998, 13 (06) :667-676
[10]   DEVELOPMENT OF A BRIEF 24-HOUR MIGRAINE-SPECIFIC QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
HARTMAIER, SL ;
SANTANELLO, NC ;
EPSTEIN, RS ;
SILBERSTEIN, SD .
HEADACHE, 1995, 35 (06) :320-329