Relationship between the exposure to cisplatin, DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes and tumour response in patients with solid tumours

被引:126
作者
Schellens, JHM [1 ]
Ma, J [1 ]
Planting, AST [1 ]
vanderBurg, MEL [1 ]
vanMeerten, E [1 ]
deBoerDennert, M [1 ]
Schmitz, PIM [1 ]
Stoter, G [1 ]
Verweij, J [1 ]
机构
[1] DANIEL DEN HOED KLIN, ROTTERDAM CANC INST, DEPT BIOSTAT, 3008 AE ROTTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
关键词
cisplatin; solid tumour; pharmacokinetics; DNA-adduct;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1996.296
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The study was designed to investigate possible relationships between tumour response and exposure to cisplatin (area under the curve of unbound cisplatin in plasma, AUC) and DNA-adduct formation in leucocytes (WBC) in patients with solid tumours. Patients were treated with six weekly courses of cisplatin at a dose of 70 or 80 mg m(-2). The AUC was determined during the first course and DNA-adduct levels in WBC during all courses at baseline, 1 h (A(max)) and 15 h after a 3 h infusion of cisplatin. The area under the DNA-adduct-time curve (AUA) was calculated. The tumour response was determined after six courses. Forty-five evaluable patients received 237 courses of cisplatin. Sixteen patients with head and neck cancer received a dose of 80 mg m(-2) and 29 with various other tumour types received 70 mg m(-2) plus daily 50 mg oral etoposide. There were 20 responders (partial and complete) and 25 non-responders (stable and progressive disease). The AUC was highly variable (mean+/-s.d.=2.48+/-0.51 mu g h(-1) ml(-1); range 1.10-3.82) and was closely correlated with the AUA (r=0.78, P<0.0001) and A(max) (r=0.73, P<0.0001). The AUC, AUA and A(max) were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders in the total population (P<0.0001) and in the two subgroups treated at 70 or 80 mg m(-2). In logistic regression analysis AUG, AUA and A(max) were important predictors of response. The magnitude of exposure to cisplatin is, through DNA-adduct formation, the major determinant of the response rate in this population. Hence, individualised dosing of cisplatin using AUC or DNA-adducts should lead to increased response rates.
引用
收藏
页码:1569 / 1575
页数:7
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
ALBERTS DS, 1991, SEMIN ONCOL, V18, P11
[2]   RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF ETOPOSIDE AND CISPLATIN VERSUS ETOPOSIDE AND CARBOPLATIN IN PATIENTS WITH GOOD-RISK GERM-CELL TUMORS - A MULTIINSTITUTIONAL STUDY [J].
BAJORIN, DF ;
SAROSDY, MF ;
PFISTER, DG ;
MAZUMDAR, M ;
MOTZER, RJ ;
SCHER, HI ;
GELLER, NL ;
FAIR, WR ;
HERR, H ;
SOGANI, P ;
SHEINFELD, J ;
RUSSO, P ;
VLAMIS, V ;
CAREY, R ;
VOGELZANG, NJ ;
CRAWFORD, ED ;
BOSL, GJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (04) :598-606
[3]  
BLOMMAERT FA, 1993, CANCER RES, V53, P5669
[4]   HIGH-DOSE PLATINUM FOR THE TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
BRUCKNER, HW ;
WALLACH, R ;
COHEN, CJ ;
DEPPE, G ;
KABAKOW, B ;
RATNER, L ;
HOLLAND, JF .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1981, 12 (01) :64-67
[5]   EARLY CLINICAL-STUDIES WITH CIS-DIAMMINE-1,1-CYCLOBUTANE DICARBOXYLATE PLATINUM-II [J].
CALVERT, AH ;
HARLAND, SJ ;
NEWELL, DR ;
SIDDIK, ZH ;
JONES, AC ;
MCELWAIN, TJ ;
RAJU, S ;
WILTSHAW, E ;
SMITH, IE ;
BAKER, JM ;
PECKHAM, MJ ;
HARRAP, KR .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1982, 9 (03) :140-147
[6]   CARBOPLATIN DOSAGE - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF A SIMPLE FORMULA BASED ON RENAL-FUNCTION [J].
CALVERT, AH ;
NEWELL, DR ;
GUMBRELL, LA ;
OREILLY, S ;
BURNELL, M ;
BOXALL, FE ;
SIDDIK, ZH ;
JUDSON, IR ;
GORE, ME ;
WILTSHAW, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (11) :1748-1756
[7]  
CAVALETTI G, 1992, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V69, P203, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19920101)69:1<203::AID-CNCR2820690133>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-1
[9]   THE OPTIMIZATION OF CARBOPLATIN DOSE IN CARBOPLATIN, ETOPOSIDE AND BLEOMYCIN COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY FOR GOOD PROGNOSIS METASTATIC NONSEMINOMATOUS GERM-CELL TUMORS OF THE TESTIS [J].
CHILDS, WJ ;
NICHOLLS, EJ ;
HORWICH, A .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1992, 3 (04) :291-296
[10]   CISPLATIN NEPHROTOXICITY - A REVIEW [J].
DAUGAARD, G ;
ABILDGAARD, U .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 25 (01) :1-9