The Reserve Army of Labor in the Postwar U. S. Economy

被引:5
作者
Basu, Deepankar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts Amherst, Dept Econ, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1521/siso.2013.77.2.179
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The reserve army of labor is a structural necessity of capitalism. By constantly keeping a part of the labor force unemployed or under-employed but potentially available for capital to draw on if needed, the reserve army of labor maintains the viability of capital accumulation by inflicting enormous costs on the working class. In the postwar U. S. economy, the reserve army has increased from about 5-6 million in the early 1950s to around 25-30 million in the late 2000s. Average size of the reserve army, as a share of the labor force, was substantially higher in the neoliberal period (1980-2011) compared to its size in the regulated period (1948-1980). Patterns in the data suggest that the relocation of production to the low-cost global periphery might be joining labor saving technical change as another important mechanism for recruiting the reserve army and disciplining labor under neoliberal capitalism.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 201
页数:23
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, CAPITAL CRITIQUE POL
[2]  
Basu Deepankar, 2011, 248 POL EC RES I, P248
[3]  
Bowles Samuel., 1983, Beyond the Waste Land : A Democratic Alternative to Economic Decline
[4]   The flow approach to labor markets: New data sources and micro-macro links [J].
Davis, Steven J. ;
Faberman, R. Jason ;
Haltiwanger, John .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2006, 20 (03) :3-26
[5]  
Foley D.K., 1986, UNDERSTANDING CAPITA
[6]  
Foster JohnBellamy., 2011, Monthly Review, V63
[7]  
GLEICHER D, 1989, SCI SOC, V53, P29
[8]   The Financial and Economic Crisis of 2008: A Systemic Crisis of Neoliberal Capitalism [J].
Kotz, David M. .
REVIEW OF RADICAL POLITICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 41 (03) :305-317
[9]  
Sweezy Paul., 1942, THEORY CAPITALIST DE
[10]   What's behind the rise in profitability in the US in the 1980s and 1990s? [J].
Wolff, EN .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 27 (04) :479-499