Current Staging Systems for Pancreatic Cancer

被引:58
作者
Appel, Betsy L. [1 ]
Tolat, Parag [2 ]
Evans, Douglas B. [1 ]
Tsai, Susan [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Surg, Div Surg Oncol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Radiol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; staging; resectability; LYMPH-NODE RATIO; EXTENDED RETROPERITONEAL LYMPHADENECTOMY; PREDICTS POOR-PROGNOSIS; PORTAL-VEIN RESECTION; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; PERIAMPULLARY ADENOCARCINOMA; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIATION; ADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION;
D O I
10.1097/PPO.0b013e318278c5b5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Accurate pretreatment staging of pancreatic cancer is a crucial initial step in the development of a stage-specific treatment plan, either on- or off-protocol for any patient with pancreatic cancer. Importantly, current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging utilizes the maximal information available; if surgery has been performed, then pathological information from the resected specimen will provide additional information for both T and N staging. If surgery has not been performed, then staging is based on information from available cross-sectional imaging studies. Although American Joint Committee on Cancer staging was modified in the sixth edition to reflect the survival difference between patients with operable/resectable versus nonoperable/unresectable disease, the precise definitions of resectability continue to evolve. It is essential for clinicians of different specialties to understand the definitions of resectability to facilitate optimal patient care and to allow for accurate interpretation of the literature. This review focuses on important aspects of the pretreatment assessment of patients with particular attention to definitions of resectability. Computed tomography has become the optimal imaging modality for pancreatic cancer staging, but other adjunct studies, including endoscopic ultrasound and laparoscopy, may provide additional staging information especially in circumstances where computed tomography technology is limited. In addition, the process of a standardized pathological review is summarized, with emphasis on assessment of the superior mesenteric artery margin and the definitions of R0, R1, and R2. Finally, the prognostic importance of key components of the pathological report such as lymph node status, lymph node ratio, and treatment effect is reviewed.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 549
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]
Efficacy and safety of self-expandable metal stents for biliary decompression in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: a prospective study [J].
Aadam, A. Aziz ;
Evans, Douglas B. ;
Khan, Abdul ;
Oh, Young ;
Dua, Kulwinder .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 76 (01) :67-75
[2]
The clinical utility of serum CA 19-9 in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: An evidence based appraisal [J].
Ballehaninna, Umashankar K. ;
Chamberlain, Ronald S. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 3 (02) :105-119
[3]
Predictive and Prognostic Value of CA 19-9 in Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma [J].
Barton, Joshua G. ;
Bois, John P. ;
Sarr, Michael G. ;
Wood, Christina M. ;
Qin, Rui ;
Thomsen, Kristine M. ;
Kendrick, Michael L. ;
Farnell, Michael B. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2009, 13 (11) :2050-2058
[4]
Validation of the 6th Edition AJCC Pancreatic Cancer Staging System - Report from the National Cancer Database [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Bentrem, David J. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. ;
Ritchey, Jamie ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Talamonti, Mark S. .
CANCER, 2007, 110 (04) :738-744
[5]
Perineural and Intraneural Invasion in Posttherapy Pancreaticoduodenectomy Specimens Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma [J].
Chatterjee, Deyali ;
Katz, Matthew H. ;
Rashid, Asif ;
Wang, Hua ;
Iuga, Alina C. ;
Varadhachary, Gauri R. ;
Wolff, Robert A. ;
Lee, Jeffrey E. ;
Pisters, Peter W. ;
Crane, Christopher H. ;
Gomez, Henry F. ;
Abbruzzese, James L. ;
Fleming, Jason B. ;
Wang, Huamin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 36 (03) :409-417
[6]
The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy [J].
Conlon, KC ;
Dougherty, E ;
Klimstra, DS ;
Coit, DG ;
Turnbull, ADM ;
Brennan, MF .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1996, 223 (02) :134-140
[7]
EVANS DB, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P1335
[8]
Surgical Treatment of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreas Cancer: Expert Consensus Statement [J].
Evans, Douglas B. ;
Farnell, Michael B. ;
Lillemoe, Keith D. ;
Vollmer, Charles, Jr. ;
Strasberg, Steven M. ;
Schulick, Richard D. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (07) :1736-1744
[9]
Pancreatoduodenectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma Implications of Positive Margin on Survival [J].
Fatima, Javairiah ;
Schnelldorfer, Thomas ;
Barton, Joshua ;
Wood, Christina M. ;
Wiste, Heather J. ;
Smyrk, Thomas C. ;
Zhang, Lizhi ;
Sarr, Michael G. ;
Nagorney, David M. ;
Farnell, Michael B. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2010, 145 (02) :167-172
[10]
The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in pancreatic and periampullary malignancies [J].
Friess, H ;
Kleeff, J ;
Silva, JC ;
Sadowski, C ;
Baer, HU ;
Büchler, MW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 186 (06) :675-682