Sensitivity of three recent questionnaires to mild traumatic brain injury-related effects

被引:49
作者
Paniak, C
Phillips, K
Toller-Lobe, G
Durand, A
Nagy, J
机构
[1] Glenrose Rehabil Hosp, Dept Psychol, Edmonton, AB T5G 0B7, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2M7, Canada
[3] Glenrose Rehabil Hosp, Psychol Serv, Edmonton, AB T5G 0B7, Canada
[4] Glenrose Rehabil Hosp, Phys Therapy Serv, Edmonton, AB T5G 0B7, Canada
[5] Glenrose Rehabil Hosp, Med Serv, Edmonton, AB T5G 0B7, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00001199-199906000-00002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity of three recently developed questionnaires to mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI)-related effects. Design: Comparison of an MTBI group, within 3 weeks of injury, to a normal control group, setting: Outpatient rehabilitation clinic. Subjects: 120 MTBI patients and 120 age, education, sex, and preinjury socioeconomic status-matched normal control subjects. Main outcome measures: The Problem Checklist (PCL) from the New York Head Injury Family Interview to assess MTBI symptoms, the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) to assess functional burden associated with health problems, and the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) to assess home, social, and productive activities. Results: Patients' self-ratings on the PCL and SF-36, but not the CIQ, were generally worse than those of the normal controls. The largest differences were obtained on SF-36 measures that appear to assess musculoskeletal injury effects. Conclusions: The PCL and SF-36 show promise as sensitive measures of MTBI-related effects. The SF-36 may be particularly useful in evaluating associated musculoskeletal injuries, which might otherwise be overlooked by MTBI health care providers.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 219
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY - PATHOPHYSIOLOGY, NATURAL-HISTORY, AND CLINICAL MANAGEMENT [J].
ALEXANDER, MP .
NEUROLOGY, 1995, 45 (07) :1253-1260
[2]  
BLISHEN BR, 1987, CAN REV SOC ANTHROP, V24, P465
[3]  
CAVALLO M M, 1992, Brain Injury, V6, P327, DOI 10.3109/02699059209034947
[4]   Outcomes in the first 5 years after traumatic brain injury [J].
Corrigan, JD ;
Smith-Knapp, K ;
Granger, CV .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1998, 79 (03) :298-305
[5]   RELATIVE EFFECTS OF BRAIN AND NON-BRAIN INJURIES ON NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL OUTCOME [J].
DACEY, R ;
DIKMEN, S ;
TEMKIN, N ;
MCLEAN, A ;
ARMSDEN, G ;
WINN, HR .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1991, 31 (02) :217-222
[6]  
Dahmer ER., 1993, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V8, P12, DOI [10.1097/00001199-199308020-00004, DOI 10.1097/00001199-199308020-00004]
[7]  
Deane M, 1996, BRIT J NEUROSURG, V10, P187
[8]  
GLASS GV, STAT METHODS ED PSYC, P84
[9]  
GUALTIERI CT, 1995, NEUROPSY NEUROPSY BE, V8, P127
[10]   Functional measures after traumatic brain injury: Ceiling effects of FIM, FIM+FAM, DRS, and CIQ [J].
Hall, KM ;
Mann, N ;
High, WM ;
Wright, J ;
Kreutzer, JS ;
Wood, D .
JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 1996, 11 (05) :27-39