Liposomal amphotericin B versus conventional amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of persistently febrile neutropenic patients

被引:61
作者
Cagnoni, PJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Ctr Canc, Denver, CO 80262 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jac/49.suppl_1.81
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Liposomal amphotercin B was compared with conventional amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in febrile neutropenic patients in a randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial. Using a composite end-point, the two drugs were equivalent in overall efficacy. However, the liposomal amphotericin B treatment group had fewer proven fungal infections, fewer infusion-related side effects and less nephrotoxicity. Patient data from that study were analysed to compare the pharmacoeconomics of liposomal versus conventional amphotericin B therapy. Itemized billing data from 414 patients were collected and analysed. Hospital costs from first dose were significantly higher for all patients who received liposomal amphotericin B ($48962 versus $43183, P=0.02). However, hospital costs were very sensitive to the cost of the study medication ($39648 versus $43048, when acquisition costs are not included, P=0.4). Using decision analysis models and sensitivity analyses to vary the cost of study medications and risk of nephrotoxicity, the break-even points for the cost of liposomal therapy were calculated to range from $72 to $87 per 50 mg for all patients, and $83 to $112 per 50 mg in allogeneic bone marrow transplant patients. Therefore, the drug acquisition costs and the risk of nephrotoxicity are important factors in determining the cost-effectiveness of liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy in persistently febrile neutropenic patients. In a recent randomized double-blind study comparing liposomal amphotericin B at 3 or 5 mg/kg/day with amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) 5 mg/kg/day as empirical antifungal treatment in patients with febrile neutropenia, liposomal amphotericin B was associated with less toxicity than ABLC, both in terms of infusion-related reactions and nephrotoxicity. The incidence of study drug discontinuation due to toxicity was: liposomal amphotericin B 3 mg/kg/day, 14%; liposomal amphotericin B 5 mg/kg/day, 15%; and ABLC, 42% (P<0.001).
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 86
页数:6
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Pharmacoeconomic analysis of liposomal amphotericin B versus conventional amphotericin B in the empirical treatment of persistently febrile neutropenic patients
    Cagnoni, PJ
    Walsh, TJ
    Prendergast, MM
    Bodensteiner, D
    Hiemenz, S
    Greenberg, RN
    Arndt, CAS
    Schuster, M
    Seibel, N
    Yeldandi, V
    Tong, KB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (12) : 2476 - 2483
  • [2] SYSTEMICALLY ADMINISTERED ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS - A REVIEW OF THEIR CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTIC APPLICATIONS
    LYMAN, CA
    WALSH, TJ
    [J]. DRUGS, 1992, 44 (01) : 9 - 35
  • [3] Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia
    Walsh, TJ
    Finberg, RW
    Arndt, C
    Hiemenz, J
    Schwartz, C
    Bodensteiner, D
    Pappas, P
    Seibel, N
    Greenberg, RN
    Dummer, S
    Schuster, M
    Holcenberg, JS
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (10) : 764 - 771
  • [4] A randomized, double-blind comparative trial evaluating the safety of liposomal amphotericin B versus amphotericin B lipid complex in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia
    Wingard, JR
    White, MH
    Anaissie, E
    Raffalli, J
    Goodman, J
    Arrieta, A
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 31 (05) : 1155 - 1163