Hybrid flux-splitting schemes for a two-phase flow model

被引:105
作者
Evje, S [1 ]
Fjelde, KK [1 ]
机构
[1] RF Rogaland Res, N-5008 Bergen, Norway
关键词
two-phase flow; hyperbolic system of conservation laws; flux-vector splitting; flux-difference splitting; hybrid scheme; numerical dissipation;
D O I
10.1006/jcph.2001.6962
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper we deal with the construction of hybrid flux-vector-splitting (FVS) schemes and flux-difference-splitting (FDS) schemes for a two-phase model for one-dimensional flow. The model consists of two mass conservation equations (one for each phase) and a common momentum equation. The complexity of this model, as far as numerical computation is concerned. is related to the fact that the flux cannot be expressed in terms of its conservative variables. This is the motivation for studying numerical schemes which are not based on (approximate) Riemann solvers and/or calculations of Jacobian matrix. This work concerns the extension of an FVS type scheme, a Van Leer type scheme, and an advection upstream splitting method (AUSM) type scheme to the current two-phase model. Our schemes are obtained through natural extensions of corresponding schemes studied by Y. Wada and M.-S. Liou (1997, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 18, 633-657) for Euler equations. We explore the various schemes for flow cases which involve both fast and slow transients. In particular, we demonstrate that the FVS scheme is able to capture fast-propagating acoustic waves in a monotone way, while it introduces an excessive numerical dissipation at volume fraction contact (steady and moving) discontinuities. On the other hand. the AUSM scheme gives accurate resolution of contact discontinuities but produces oscillatory approximations of acoustic waves. This motivates us to propose other hybrid FVS/FDS schemes obtained by removing numerical dissipation at contact discontinuities in the FVS and Van Leer schemes. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
引用
收藏
页码:674 / 701
页数:28
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Benzoni-Gavage S., 1991, THESIS
[2]   A hierarchy of models for two-phase flows [J].
Bouchut, F ;
Brenier, Y ;
Cortes, J ;
Ripoll, JF .
JOURNAL OF NONLINEAR SCIENCE, 2000, 10 (06) :639-660
[3]   A numerical method using upwind schemes for the resolution of two-phase flows [J].
Coquel, F ;
ElAmine, K ;
Godlewski, E ;
Perthame, B ;
Rascle, P .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1997, 136 (02) :272-288
[4]   A density perturbation method to study the eigenstructure of two-phase flow equation systems [J].
Cortes, J ;
Debussche, A ;
Toumi, I .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1998, 147 (02) :463-484
[5]  
Cortes J, 1998, COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS '98, VOL 1, PARTS 1 AND 2, P416
[6]  
Delhaye J.M., 1981, THERMOHYDRAULICS 2 P
[7]   A low-diffusion flux-splitting scheme for Navier-Stokes calculations [J].
Edwards, JR .
COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 1997, 26 (06) :635-659
[8]  
EVJE S, 2001, 205 RF
[9]   A rough finite volume scheme for modeling two-phase flow in a pipeline [J].
Faille, I ;
Heintzé, E .
COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 1999, 28 (02) :213-241
[10]  
FJELDE KK, IN PRESS COMPUT FLUI