Component sharing in the management of product variety: A study of automotive braking systems

被引:195
作者
Fisher, M
Ramdas, K
Ulrich, K
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Darden Sch, Darden Grad Sch Business, Charlottesville, VA 22906 USA
关键词
component sharing; product variety; commonality; product platform; product design;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.45.3.297
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Product variety in many industries has increased steadily throughout this century. Component sharing-using the same version of a component across multiple products-is increasingly viewed by companies as a way to offer high variety in the marketplace while retaining low variety in their operations. Yet, despite the popularity of component sharing in industry, little is known about how to design an effective component-sharing strategy or about the factors that influence the success of such a strategy. In this paper we critically examine component sharing using automotive front brakes as an example. We consider three basic questions: (1) What are the key drivers and trade-offs of component-sharing decisions? (2) How much variation exists in actual component-sharing practice? and (3) How can this variation be explained? To answer these questions, we develop an analytic model of component sharing and show through empirical testing that this model explains much of the variation in sharing practice for automotive braking systems. We find that the optimal number of brake rotors is a function of the range of vehicle weights, sales volume, fixed component design and tooling costs, variable costs, and the variation in production volume across the models of the product line. We conclude with a discussion of the general managerial implications of our findings.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 315
页数:19
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MEASURES MANUFACTURI
[2]   SIMPLE TEST FOR HETEROSCEDASTICITY AND RANDOM COEFFICIENT VARIATION [J].
BREUSCH, TS ;
PAGAN, AR .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (05) :1287-1294
[3]  
Clark K.B., 1991, PRODUCT DEV PERFORMA
[4]  
CLARK KB, 1990, HARVARD BUS REV, V68, P107
[5]  
*CRAIN COMM INC, 1982, AUT NEWS MARK DAT BO
[6]   STRATEGY, STRUCTURE AND PERFORMANCE IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT - OBSERVATIONS FROM THE AUTO INDUSTRY [J].
CUSUMANO, MA ;
NOBEOKA, K .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1992, 21 (03) :265-293
[7]   FLEXIBILITY AND MARKETING MANUFACTURING COORDINATION [J].
DEGROOTE, X .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1994, 36 (02) :153-167
[8]  
*DELL COMP CORP, 1994, ANN REP
[9]  
*EIU, 1987, MOT BUS INT
[10]  
FISHER ML, 1996, DESIGNING FIRM