Group purchasing, nonlinear tariffs, and oligopoly

被引:49
作者
Marvel, Howard P. [1 ]
Yang, Huanxing [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
nonlinear tariffs; loyalty discounts; competition; group purchasing organization;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijindorg.2007.10.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Loyalty discounts are nonlinear tariffs that condition rebates or marginal prices on meeting aggregate purchase or market share targets. These discounts are widespread, and are often the impetus for consumers to form buying groups, or group purchase organizations (GPOs). This paper models the competitive effects of the introduction of a GPO into a market within which the preferences of the GPO's members are horizontally differentiated. While nonlinear tariffs are an effective way for a monopolist to extract consumer surplus, when two suppliers compete using such schedules, the results are far more competitive in comparison to simple Bertrand-Nash competition with linear tariffs. This result holds when the product of each of the suppliers is attractive to a substantial portion of consumers. In our model, the nonlinear schedule puts all customers "in play" to a degree that contrasts sharply with the competition at the margin characteristic of constant per unit prices. Moreover, competing in nonlinear tariffs removes allocative inefficiency that can result from single price competition. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1090 / 1105
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   SPLIT AWARDS, PROCUREMENT, AND INNOVATION [J].
ANTON, JJ ;
YAO, DA .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1989, 20 (04) :538-552
[2]   Competitive price discrimination [J].
Armstrong, M ;
Vickers, J .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 32 (04) :579-605
[3]  
Armstrong M, 2006, COMPETITIVE NONLINEA
[4]  
Che YK, 1997, J ECON MANAGE STRAT, V6, P175
[5]   The role of firm size in bilateral bargaining: A study of the cable television industry [J].
Chipty, T ;
Snyder, CM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1999, 81 (02) :326-340
[6]   Third-degree price discrimination in oligopoly: all-out competition and strategic commitment [J].
Corts, KS .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 29 (02) :306-323
[7]  
DANA J, 2006, BUYER GROUPS STRATEG
[8]  
ELLISON SF, 2001, 0127 MIT DEP EC
[9]  
GREENLEE P, 2005, 042 EAG US DEP JUST
[10]  
HOLMES TJ, 1989, AM ECON REV, V79, P244