Degrees of differential gene expression: detecting biologically significant expression differences and estimating their magnitudes

被引:39
作者
Bickel, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Georgia, Off Biostat & Bioinformat, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/btg468
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Motivation: Many methods of identifying differential expression in genes depend on testing the null hypotheses of exactly equal means or distributions of expression levels for each gene across groups, even though a statistically significant difference in the expression level does not imply the occurrence of any difference of biological or clinical significance. This is because a mathematical definition of 'differential expression' as any non-zero difference does not correspond to the differential expression biologists seek. Furthermore, while some current methods account for multiple comparisons in hypothesis tests, they do not accordingly adjust estimates of the degrees to which genes are differentially expressed. Both problems lead to overstating the relevance of findings. Results: Testing whether genes have relevant differential expression can be accomplished with customized null hypotheses, thereby redefining 'differential expression' in a way that is more biologically meaningful. When such tests control the false discovery rate, they effectively discover genes based on a desired quantile of differential gene expression. Estimation of the degree to which genes are differentially expressed has been corrected for multiple comparisons.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / U255
页数:30
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Resampling-based multiple testing: Examples and methods for P-value adjustment
[2]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[3]   Robust cluster analysis of microarray gene expression data with the number of clusters determined biologically [J].
Bickel, DR .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (07) :818-824
[4]  
BICKEL DR, 2003, UNPUB ERROR RATE DEC
[5]   Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data [J].
Dudoit, S ;
Fridlyand, J ;
Speed, TP .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 97 (457) :77-87
[6]   Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment [J].
Efron, B ;
Tibshirani, R ;
Storey, JD ;
Tusher, V .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 96 (456) :1151-1160
[7]   Empirical Bayes methods and false discovery rates for microarrays [J].
Efron, B ;
Tibshirani, R .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 23 (01) :70-86
[8]  
FERNANDO RL, 2003, IN PRESS GENETICS
[9]  
GENOVESE C, 2002, 674 CARN MELL U
[10]  
Green DM., 1966, Signal detection theory and psychophysics, P1969