Probabilistic assessment "dangerous" climate change and emissions pathways

被引:63
作者
Schneider, SH
Mastrandrea, MD
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Ctr Environm Sci & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Article; 2; anthropogenic interference; risk management; uncertainty analysis; integrated assessments;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0506356102
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Climate policy decisions driving future greenhouse gas mitigation efforts will strongly influence the success of compliance with Article 2 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the prevention of "dangerous anthropogenic interference (DAI) with the climate system." However, success will be measured in very different ways by different stakeholders, suggesting a spectrum of possible definitions for DAI The likelihood of avoiding a given threshold for DAI depends in part on uncertainty in the climate system, notably, the range of uncertainty in climate sensitivity. We combine a set of probabilistic global average temperature metrics for DAI with probability distributions of future climate change produced from a combination of several published climate sensitivity distributions and a range of proposed concentration stabilization profiles differing in both stabilization level and approach trajectory, including overshoot profiles. These analyses present a "likelihood framework" to differentiate future emissions pathways with regard to their potential for preventing DAI Our analysis of overshoot profiles in comparison with non-overshoot profiles demonstrates that overshoot of a given stabilization target can significantly increase the likelihood of exceeding "dangerous" climate impact thresholds, even though equilibrium warming in our model is identical for non-overshoot concentration stabilization profiles having the same target.
引用
收藏
页码:15728 / 15735
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Strong present-day aerosol cooling implies a hot future [J].
Andreae, MO ;
Jones, CD ;
Cox, PM .
NATURE, 2005, 435 (7046) :1187-1190
[2]   Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivity [J].
Andronova, NG ;
Schlesinger, ME .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D19) :22605-22611
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PROJECTIONS FUTURE C
[4]   Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations [J].
Forest, CE ;
Stone, PH ;
Sokolov, AP ;
Allen, MR ;
Webster, MD .
SCIENCE, 2002, 295 (5552) :113-117
[5]  
GRASSL H, 2003, CLIMATE PROTECTION S
[6]   A SEQUENTIAL-DECISION STRATEGY FOR ABATING CLIMATE CHANGE [J].
HAMMITT, JK ;
LEMPERT, RJ ;
SCHLESINGER, ME .
NATURE, 1992, 357 (6376) :315-318
[7]   Evaluation endpoints and climate policy: Atmospheric stabilization, benefit-cost analysis, and near-term greenhouse-gas emissions [J].
Hammitt, JK .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1999, 41 (3-4) :447-468
[8]  
HARE W, 2005, IN PRESS CLIM CHANGE
[9]  
Hare W., 2003, Assessment of Knowledge on Impacts of Climate Change, Contribution to the Specification of Art. 2 of the UNFCCC
[10]  
KNUTTI R, 2005, IN PRESS GEOPHYS RES