Kinetic and structural evolution of self-gravitating, magnetized clouds: 2.5-dimensional simulations of decaying turbulence

被引:178
作者
Ostriker, EC [1 ]
Gammie, CF
Stone, JM
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Astron, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Isaac Newton Inst Math Sci, Cambridge CB3 0EH, England
[3] Harvard Smithsonian Ctr Astrophys, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
ISM : general; ISM : kinematics and dynamics; ISM : magnetic fields; MHD; shock waves;
D O I
10.1086/306842
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The molecular component of the Galaxy is comprised of turbulent, magnetized clouds, many of which are self-gravitating and form stars. To develop an understanding of how these clouds' kinetic and structural evolution may depend on their level of turbulence, mean magnetization, and degree of self-gravity, we perform a survey of direct numerical MHD simulations in which three parameters are independently varied. Our simulations consist of solutions to the time-dependent MI-ID equations on a two-dimensional grid with periodic boundary conditions; an additional "half" dimension is also incorporated as dependent variables in the third Cartesian direction. Two of our survey parameters, the mean magnetization parameter beta = c(sound)(2)/upsilon(Alfven)(2) and the Jeans number n(J) = L(cloud)/L(Jeans), allow us to model clouds that either meet or fail conditions for magneto-Jeans stability and magnetic criticality. Our third survey parameter, the sonic Mach number M = sigma(velocity)/c(sound), allows us to initiate turbulence of either sub- or super-Alfvenic amplitude; we employ an isothermal equation of state throughout. We evaluate the times for each cloud model to become gravitationally bound and measure each model's kinetic energy loss over the fluid-flow crossing time. We compare the evolution of density and magnetic field structural morphology and quantify the differences in the density contrast generated by internal stresses for models of differing mean magnetization. We find that the values of beta and n(J), but not the initial Mach number M, determine the time for cloud gravitational binding and collapse: for mean cloud density n(H2) = 100 cm(-3), unmagnetized models collapse after similar to 5 Myr, and magnetically supercritical models generally collapse after 5-10 Myr (although the smallest magneto-Jeans stable clouds survive gravitational collapse until t similar to 15 Myr), while magnetically subcritical clouds remain uncollapsed over the simulations; these cloud collapse times scale with the mean density as t(g) proportional to n(H2)(-1/2). We find, contrary to some previous expectations, less than a factor of 2 difference between turbulent decay times for models with varying magnetic field strength; the maximum decay time, for B similar to 14 mu G and n(H2) = 100 cm(-3), is 1.4 flow crossing times t(cross) =L/sigma(velocity) (or 8 Myr for typical giant molecular cloud cm parameters). In all models we find turbulent amplification in the magnetic field strength up to at least the level beta(pert) c(sound)(2)/delta upsilon(Alfven)(2) = 0.1. With the turbulent magnetic energy between 25% and 60% of the turbulent kinetic energy after one flow crossing time. We find that for non-self-gravitating stages of evolution, when clouds have M = 5-10, the mass-averaged density contrast magnitudes [log (rho/<(rho)over bar>)] are in the range 0.2-0.5, with the contrast increasing both toward low and high B. Although our conclusions about density statistics may be affected by our isothermal assumption, we note that only the more strongly magnetized models appear to be consistent with estimates of clump/interclump density contrasts inferred in Galactic giant molecular clouds.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 274
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Dust extinction and molecular cloud structure: L977 [J].
Alves, J ;
Lada, CJ ;
Lada, EA ;
Kenyon, SJ ;
Phelps, R .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 506 (01) :292-305
[2]   HYDROMAGNETIC-WAVES IN MOLECULAR CLOUDS [J].
ARONS, J ;
MAX, CE .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1975, 196 (02) :L77-L81
[3]   FILAMENTARY STRUCTURE IN THE ORION MOLECULAR CLOUD [J].
BALLY, J ;
LANGER, WD ;
STARK, AA ;
WILSON, RW .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 312 (02) :L45-&
[4]  
BLAAUW A, 1991, NATO ADV SCI I C-MAT, V342, P125
[5]  
Blitz L., 1993, Protostars and Planets III, P125
[6]   PROBLEMS OF GRAVITATIONAL STABILITY IN THE PRESENCE OF A MAGNETIC FIELD [J].
CHANDRASEKHAR, S ;
FERMI, E .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1953, 118 (01) :116-141
[7]   OH ZEEMAN OBSERVATIONS OF DARK CLOUDS [J].
CRUTCHER, RM ;
TROLAND, TH ;
GOODMAN, AA ;
HEILES, C ;
KAZES, I ;
MYERS, PC .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 407 (01) :175-184
[8]  
CRUTCHER RM, 1999, INTERSTELLAR TURBULE
[9]  
DEJONG T, 1980, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V91, P68
[10]   Cloud/intercloud structure from nonlinear magnetic waves [J].
Elmegreen, BG .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 480 (02) :674-+