Optimizing reserve expansion for disjunct populations of San Joaquin kit fox

被引:26
作者
Haight, RG
Cypher, B
Kelly, PA
Phillips, S
Ralls, K
Possingham, HP
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, USDA, N Cent Res Stn, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery Program, Fresno, CA 93727 USA
[3] Univ Queensland, Dept Zool, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Dept Math, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[5] Smithsonian Inst, Natl Zool Pk, Conservat & Res Ctr, Washington, DC 20008 USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
endangered species; habitat protection; kit fox; reserve design; San Joaquin Valley;
D O I
10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00263-5
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Expanding habitat protection is a common strategy for species conservation. We present a model to optimize the expansion of reserves for disjunct populations of all endangered species. The objective is to maximize the expected number of surviving populations subject to budget and habitat constraints. The model accounts for benefits of reserve expansion in teens of likelihood of persistence of each population and monetary cost. Solving the model with incrementally higher budgets helps prioritize sites for expansion and produces a cost curve showing funds required for incremental increases in the objective. We applied the model to the problem of allocating funds among eight reserves for the endangered San Joaquin kit fox ( Vulpes macrotis mutica) in California, USA. The priorities for reserve expansion were related to land cost and amount of already-protected habitat at each site. Western Kern and Ciervo-Panoche sites received highest priority because land costs were low and moderate amounts of already-protected habitat resulted in large reductions in extinction risk for small increments of habitat protection. The sensitivity analysis focused oil the impacts of kit fox reproductive success and home range ill non-native grassland sites. If grassland habitat is lower quality than brushland habitat resulting in higher annual variation in reproductive success or larger home ranges, then protecting habitat at the best grassland site (Ciervo-Panoche) is not cost-efficient relative to shrubland sites (Western Kern, Antelope Plain, Carrizo Plain). Finally, results suggested that lowest priority should be given to three relatively high-cost grassland sites (Camp Roberts, Contra Costa, and Western Madera) because protecting habitat at those sites would be expensive and have little effect oil the expected number of surviving kit fox populations. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 72
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Bazaraa MokhtarS., 1979, Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms
[2]   On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management [J].
Beissinger, SR ;
Westphal, MI .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1998, 62 (03) :821-841
[3]   Spatial optimization of prairie dog colonies for black-footed ferret recovery [J].
Bevers, M ;
Hof, J ;
Uresk, DW ;
Schenbeck, GL .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1997, 45 (04) :495-507
[4]  
*CAL ASFMRA, 2001, TRENDS AGR LAND LEAS
[5]   USING MATHEMATICAL-PROGRAMMING TO ADDRESS THE MULTIPLE RESERVE SELECTION PROBLEM - AN EXAMPLE FROM THE EYRE PENINSULA, SOUTH-AUSTRALIA [J].
COCKS, KD ;
BAIRD, IA .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1989, 49 (02) :113-130
[6]  
COSTELLO C, 2004, DYNAMICS RESERVE SIT
[7]  
Cypher BL, 2000, WILDLIFE MONOGR, P1
[8]   How much habitat is enough? [J].
Fahrig, L .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2001, 100 (01) :65-74
[9]  
*GAMS DEV CORP, 1990, GEN ALG MOD SYST VER
[10]   Habitat evaluation using GIS - A case study applied to the San Joaquin Kit Fox [J].
Gerrard, R ;
Stine, P ;
Church, R ;
Gilpin, M .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2001, 52 (04) :239-255