Cervical incompetence: Elective, emergent, or urgent cerclage

被引:86
作者
Kurup, M [1 ]
Goldkrand, JW [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Hlth Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Savannah, GA USA
关键词
cervical incompetence; cerclage;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70542-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We define criteria for insertion of cervical cerclage clone electively (historical), urgently (in patients without symptoms), or emergently (in patients with symptoms). We compare outcomes as determined by prolongation of pregnancy and survival in each of these groups, and we define whether urgent or emergent cerclage imparted a higher risk of spontaneous rupture of membranes or chorioamnionitis than that associated with elective cerclage. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of all cervical cerclages placed at Memorial Medical Center between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 1997. Outcomes oberved were as follows: (1) prolongation of pregnancy in weeks after cervical cerclage, (2) presence of spontaneous rupture of membranes or clinical chorioamnionitis necessitating delivery, and (3) neonatal outcome. RESULTS: For prolongation of pregnancy the following results were obtained: emergent cerclage, 8.3 +/- 0.9 weeks; urgent cerclage, 12.2 +/- 1.5 weeks; and elective cerclage, 20.2 +/- 0.9 weeks (elective versus emergent and urgent, P < .05). For average gestational age at delivery, the results were as follows: emergent cerclage, 30.5 +/- 0.9 weeks; urgent cerclage, 33.1 +/- 1.4 weeks; and elective cerclage, 35.5 +/- 0.9 weeks (elective versus emergent and urgent, P < .05). The total neonatal survival was 85.7%. The incidence of spontaneous rupture of membranes was as follows: emergent cerclage, 51%; urgent cerclage, 40%; elective cerclage, 18% (elective versus emergent and urgent, P < .05). The incidence of clinical chorioamnionitis showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: It is clear that emergency cerclages confer some benefit in patients with evidence of cervical incompetence. From this study it is evident that there is a new group of patients who need cerclage on an urgent basis as shown by subtle ultrasonographic changes in the cervix. Their behavior mirrors that of those belonging to the emergent group, suggesting that if they were left untreated they would need cerclage on an emergency basis.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 244
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Aarts J M, 1995, Obstet Gynecol Surv, V50, P459, DOI 10.1097/00006254-199506000-00022
[2]   PREDICTION OF CERVICAL CERCLAGE OUTCOME BY ENDOVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY [J].
ANDERSEN, HF ;
KARIMI, A ;
SAKALA, EP ;
KALUGDAN, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (04) :1102-1106
[3]  
ANDERSEN HF, 1991, SEMIN PERINATOL, V15, P140
[4]  
BARTH WH, 1990, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V170, P323
[5]  
Golan A, 1989, Obstet Gynecol Surv, V44, P96, DOI 10.1097/00006254-198902000-00004
[6]  
GOODLIN RC, 1979, OBSTET GYNECOL, V54, P748
[7]   The significance of transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix in women treated with emergency cerclage [J].
Guzman, ER ;
Houlihan, C ;
Vintzileos, A ;
Ivan, J ;
Benito, C ;
Kappy, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (02) :471-476
[8]  
GUZMAN ER, 1998, J ULTRAS MED, V16, pS47
[9]  
HARGER JH, 1980, OBSTET GYNECOL, V56, P543
[10]  
Herman G. E, 1902, J OBSTET GYN BR COMM, V2, P256