Early-onset alcoholism with conduct disorder: Go/no go learning deficits, working memory capacity, and personality

被引:54
作者
Finn, PR [1 ]
Mazas, CA [1 ]
Justus, AN [1 ]
Steinmetz, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
early-onset alcoholism; conduct disorder; behavioral inhibition; working memory; personality;
D O I
10.1097/00000374-200202000-00006
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Two studies were conducted to investigate the disinhibitory mechanisms that (1) discriminate early-onset alcoholism (EOA) with conduct disorder (CD; antisocial EOA) from a nonantisocial subtype of EOA and (2) are associated with novelty-seeking and low harm avoidance. Methods: Young adults with antisocial EOA (n = 96), with nonantisocial EOA (without CD; n = 80), with CD alone (n = 50), and controls (n = 125) were given two go/no go tasks (one with monetary loss and the other with shock punishment), the Digit Span test (working memory capacity), and personality measures of harm avoidance, novelty-seeking/impulsivity, excitement-seeking, and negative affectivity. Results: Study 1 revealed that antisocial EOA subjects had poor behavioral inhibition compared with nonantisocial EOAs and controls on both go/no go tasks and with the CD-alone group on the monetary-loss task. Low Digit Span scores accentuated poor inhibition in antisocial EOAs on the monetary loss, but not the shock task. EOA with low Digit Span was associated with higher hit rates on the shock task. Study 2 revealed that antisocial EOAs had high novelty-seeking/impulsivity and low harm avoidance compared with both nonantisocial EOAs and controls. Low harm avoidance was associated with poor inhibition with shock punishment, and this association was mediated by CD. For subjects with low Digit Span scores, novelty-seeking/impulsivity was associated with poor inhibition to monetary-loss punishment and higher hit rates to shock punishment. Conclusions: The results suggest two disinhibitory mechanisms that distinguish antisocial from nonantisocial EOA: an increased sensitivity to reward in nonaversive contexts associated with novelty-seeking/impulsivity and a decreased sensitivity to punishment in aversive contexts associated with low harm avoidance. Results also suggest that EOA and novelty-seeking/impulsivity are associated with a greater response to rewards in those with low working memory capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 206
页数:21
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Working memory impairments in alcohol-dependent participants without clinical amnesia [J].
Ambrose, ML ;
Bowden, SC ;
Whelan, G .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 25 (02) :185-191
[2]  
Arbuckle J. L., 1997, AMOS VERSION 3 61 CO
[3]  
BABOR TF, 1992, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V49, P599
[4]  
Baddeley A., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[5]  
Baddeley A.D., 1999, Models of Working Memory, P28, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.005
[6]   Personality disorder and dimension differences between type A and type B substance abusers [J].
Ball, SA ;
Kranzler, HR ;
Tennen, H ;
Poling, JC ;
Rounsaville, BJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 1998, 12 (01) :1-12
[7]  
Ball SA, 1996, ALCOHOL HEALTH RES W, V20, P30
[8]  
Barkley R.A., 1996, Journal of Attention Disorders, V1, P41, DOI DOI 10.1177/108705479600100104
[9]   Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD [J].
Barkley, RA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (01) :65-94
[10]   What is inherited in the predisposition toward alcoholism? A proposed model [J].
Begleiter, H ;
Porjesz, B .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1999, 23 (07) :1125-1135