Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: an event-related potential study

被引:53
作者
Angrilli, A
Penolazzi, B
Vespignani, F
De Vincenzi, M
Job, R
Ciccarelli, L
Palomba, D
Stegagno, L
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Gen Psychol, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Chieti, Rome, Italy
[3] CNR, Inst Psychol, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Padua, Dept Dev & Social Psychol, Padua, Italy
关键词
event related potentials; electroencephalogram; Italian language; semantic incongruity; syntactic violation; P600; left anterior negativity; N400;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02528-9
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The present experiment investigated cortical responses of native Italian subjects during reading of short sentences including semantic or morphosyntactic violations. Given the specificity of the Italian language in which the sequencing of words is relatively more free than in English or other languages, we investigated whether syntactic and semantic violations were able to elicit event-related potential (ERP) components similar to those found in other languages. Cortical potentials evoked by the anomalous target word were recorded at frontal, central and parietal electrodes. Results showed that, in Italian, semantic anomaly elicited a negative wave (N400) in the 400-500 ms time-window and syntactic error evoked a slower positive wave (P600) in the 500-700 ms time-window. Syntactic error also evoked a significant left anterior negativity in the 350-450 ms time-window, supporting the view that syntactic processes precedes semantic analysis. Thus, Italian language, notwithstanding its specificity, shows ERPs responses to semantic and syntactic violations, with effects, scalp distribution and latency similar to those found in German, Dutch and English. Results point to a cross-linguistic consistency of the semantic and syntactic ERP components associated with the detection of linguistic anomalies. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 8
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   EEG brain mapping of phonological and semantic tasks in Italian and German languages [J].
Angrilli, A ;
Dobel, C ;
Rockstroh, B ;
Stegagno, L ;
Elbert, T .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 111 (04) :706-716
[2]  
Bach E., 1986, Language and Cognitive Processes, V1, P249, DOI DOI 10.1080/01690968608404677
[3]   CROSS-LINGUISTIC DIFFERENCES IN PARSING - RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF THE LATE CLOSURE STRATEGY IN SPANISH [J].
CUETOS, F ;
MITCHELL, DC .
COGNITION, 1988, 30 (01) :73-105
[4]   Syntactic analysis in sentence comprehension: Effects of dependency types and grammatical constraints [J].
DeVincenzi, M .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1996, 25 (01) :117-133
[5]  
Forster K. I., 1979, Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Essays Presented to Merrill Garrett
[6]   MAKING AND CORRECTING ERRORS DURING SENTENCE COMPREHENSION - EYE-MOVEMENTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURALLY AMBIGUOUS SENTENCES [J].
FRAZIER, L ;
RAYNER, K .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 14 (02) :178-210
[7]   Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and second-pass parsing processes [J].
Friederici, AD ;
Mecklinger, A .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1996, 25 (01) :157-176
[8]   Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information [J].
Friederici, AD ;
Steinhauer, K ;
Frisch, S .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1999, 27 (03) :438-453
[9]   Brain responses during sentence reading: visual input affects central processes [J].
Gunter, TC ;
Friederici, AD ;
Hahne, A .
NEUROREPORT, 1999, 10 (15) :3175-3178
[10]   THE SYNTACTIC POSITIVE SHIFT (SPS) AS AN ERP MEASURE OF SYNTACTIC PROCESSING [J].
HAGOORT, P ;
BROWN, C ;
GROOTHUSEN, J .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1993, 8 (04) :439-483