Co-benefit evaluation for urban public transportation sector a case of Shenyang, China

被引:82
作者
Geng, Yong [1 ]
Ma, Zhixiao [1 ,2 ]
Xue, Bing [1 ]
Ren, Wanxia [1 ]
Liu, Zhe [1 ,2 ]
Fujita, Tsuyoshi [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Appl Ecol, Key Lab Pollut Ecol & Environm Engn, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Provin, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Co-benefits; Greenhouse gas; Air pollutants; Public transportation; Cost; Urban area; CLIMATE-CHANGE; AIR-POLLUTION; VEHICLE OWNERSHIP; ENERGY-POLICY; SHANGHAI; EMISSIONS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.034
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Buses and taxies are the most widely used vehicles for urban public transportation in developing countries. They contribute significantly to the emissions of greenhouse gas and air pollutants. Policy makers consider the introduction of new emissions standard vehicles and alternative fuel vehicles in bus and taxi fleets as an attractive measure for reducing the emissions of greenhouse gas and air pollutants. It is important to understand the environmental benefits and economic challenges involved in fleet conversion. However, few studies have been conducted, especially in developing countries. This study analyzes the cost effectiveness and environmental benefits of various vehicles by employing a case study in Shenyang, China. The results showed that CNG bus has the best overall economic and environmental performances, while diesel car is one possible choice for taxi selection when considering the current technology level. Although direct emissions are lower for both hybrid and electricity vehicles, embodied emissions are higher, plus higher costs, making them not suitable as public transportation tools, at least for the current stage. In order to further improve co-benefits in public transportation sector, an integrated effort is needed, including the gradual phase-out of inefficient vehicles, green vehicle purchase, infrastructure improvement and capacity-building initiatives. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 91
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   A review on global fuel economy standards, labels and technologies in the transportation sector [J].
Atabani, A. E. ;
Badruddin, Irfan Anjum ;
Mekhilef, S. ;
Silitonga, A. S. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (09) :4586-4610
[2]   Climate change and air quality -: Measures with co-benefits in China [J].
Aunan, Kristin ;
Fang, Jinghua ;
Hu, Tao ;
Seip, Hans Martin ;
Vennemo, Haakon .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (16) :4822-4829
[3]  
Bollen J. C., 2009, COBENEFITS CLIMATE P
[4]   Local air pollution and global climate change: A combined cost-benefit analysis [J].
Bollen, Johannes ;
van der Zwaan, Bob ;
Brink, Corjan ;
Eerens, Hans .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 (03) :161-181
[5]  
Cao Lin, 2010, China Environmental Science, V30, P7
[6]   Reductions in emissions of local air pollutants and co-benefits of Chinese energy policy: a Shanghai case study [J].
Chen, CH ;
Wang, BY ;
Fu, QY ;
Green, C ;
Streets, DG .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (06) :754-762
[7]   Low-carbon energy policy and ambient air pollution in Shanghai, China: A health-based economic assessment [J].
Chen, Changhong ;
Chen, Bingheng ;
Wang, Bingyan ;
Huang, Cheng ;
Zhao, Jing ;
Dai, Yi ;
Kan, Haidong .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 373 (01) :13-21
[8]  
CNPC, 2009, ANN CORP SOC RESP RE
[9]   Climate change mitigation and co-benefits of feasible transport demand policies in Beijing [J].
Creutzig, Felix ;
He, Dongquan .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 14 (02) :120-131
[10]   Constraints to green vehicle ownership: A focus group study [J].
Flamm, Bradley J. ;
Agrawal, Asha Weinstein .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 17 (02) :108-115