Northern Hemisphere Stationary Waves in Future Climate Projections

被引:41
作者
Brandefelt, Jenny [1 ]
Kornich, Heiner [2 ]
机构
[1] KTH, Dept Mech, Linne Flow Ctr, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Meteorol, Bert Bolin Ctr Climate Res, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1175/2008JCLI2373.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The response of the atmospheric large-scale circulation to an enhanced greenhouse gas (GHG) forcing varies among coupled global climate model (CGCM) simulations. In this study, 16 CGCM simulations of the response of the climate system to a 1% yr(-1) increase in the atmospheric CO2 concentration to quadrupling are analyzed with focus on Northern Hemisphere winter. A common signal in 14 out of the 16 simulations is an increased or unchanged stationary wave amplitude. A majority of the simulations may be categorized into one of three groups based on the GHG-induced changes in the atmospheric stationary waves. The response of the zonal mean barotropic wind is similar within each group. Fifty percent of the simulations belong to the first group, which is categorized by a stationary wave with five waves encompassing the entire NH and a strengthening of the zonal mean barotropic wind. The second and third groups, respectively consisting of three and two simulations, are characterized by a broadening and a northward shift of the zonal mean barotropic wind, respectively. A linear model of barotropic vorticity is employed to study the importance of these mean flow changes to the stationary wave response. The linear calculations indicate that the GHG-induced mean wind changes explain 50%, 4%, and 37% of the stationary wave changes in each group, respectively. Thus, for the majority of simulations the zonal mean wind changes do significantly explain the stationary wave response.
引用
收藏
页码:6341 / 6353
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   The response of the Southern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation to an enhanced greenhouse gas forcing [J].
Brandefelt, J ;
Källén, E .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2004, 17 (22) :4425-4442
[2]   Atmospheric modes of variability in a changing climate [J].
Brandefelt, Jenny .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (22) :5934-5943
[3]  
Branstator G, 2002, J CLIMATE, V15, P1893, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1893:CTTJSW>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   An intercomparison of regional climate simulations for Europe:: assessing uncertainties in model projections [J].
Deque, M. ;
Rowell, D. P. ;
Luethi, D. ;
Giorgi, F. ;
Christensen, J. H. ;
Rockel, B. ;
Jacob, D. ;
Kjellstrom, E. ;
de Castro, M. ;
van den Hurk, B. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2007, 81 (Suppl 1) :53-70
[6]  
DeWeaver E, 2000, J CLIMATE, V13, P3893, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<3893:ZEDOTN>2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   Properties of the Arctic tropopause [J].
Highwood, EJ ;
Hoskins, BJ ;
Berrisford, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 126 (565) :1515-1532
[9]  
Hoinka KP, 1998, MON WEATHER REV, V126, P3303, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<3303:SOTGTP>2.0.CO
[10]  
2