A note on the power provided by sibships of sizes 2, 3, and 4 in genetic covariance modeling of a codominant QTL

被引:26
作者
Dolan, CV
Boomsma, DI
Neale, MC
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Biol Psychol, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Virginia Inst Psychiat & Behav Genet, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
关键词
sibships; QTL; environmental effects; polygenic effects; covariance structures; power;
D O I
10.1023/A:1021687817609
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The contribution of size 3 and size 4 sibships to power in covariance structure modeling of a codominant QTL is investigated. Power calculations are based on the noncentral chi-square distribution. Sixteen sets of parameter values are considered. Results indicate that size 3 and size 4 sibships provided large increases in power over size 2 sibships. On average a size 3 (4) sibship is 3 (6 to 7) times as informative as a size 2 sibship. The increase in power does not depend on the specific effects sizes of the independent variables in the model. These findings extend results presented by Fulker and Cherny (1996) and Schork (1993). We consider the informativeness of the size 2, 3, and 4 sibships, which differ in the unique configuration of IBD sharing. Three of the 10 size 3 and 7 of the 36 size 4 sibships are particularly informative. The results presented concern random (unselective) sampling but do have implications for selective sampling.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 170
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Extreme selection strategies in gene mapping studies of oligogenic quantitative traits do not always increase power [J].
Allison, DB ;
Heo, M ;
Schork, NJ ;
Wong, SL ;
Elston, RC .
HUMAN HEREDITY, 1998, 48 (02) :97-107
[2]   Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees [J].
Almasy, L ;
Blangero, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1998, 62 (05) :1198-1211
[3]  
BOOMSMA DI, 1999, ADV TWIN SIB PAIR AN
[4]  
CARDON LR, 1994, AM J HUM GENET, V55, P825
[5]  
CAREY G, 1991, AM J HUM GENET, V49, P786
[6]   Optimal selection of sib pairs from random samples for linkage analysis of a QTL using the EDAC test [J].
Dolan, CV ;
Boomsma, DI .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1998, 28 (03) :197-206
[7]  
Drigalenko E, 1998, AM J HUM GENET, V63, P1242
[8]   SUBTYPES OF AUTISM BY CLUSTER-ANALYSIS [J].
EAVES, LC ;
HO, HH ;
EAVES, DM .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 1994, 24 (01) :3-22
[9]   Multivariate multipoint linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci [J].
Eaves, LJ ;
Neale, MC ;
Maes, H .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1996, 26 (05) :519-525
[10]   An improved multipoint sib-pair analysis of quantitative traits [J].
Fulker, DW ;
Cherny, SS .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1996, 26 (05) :527-532