Comparison of two strategies for intensifying antihypertensive treatment - Low-dose combination (enalapril plus felodipine ER) versus increased dose of monotherapy (enalapril)

被引:7
作者
Elliott, WJ [1 ]
Montoro, R [1 ]
Smith, D [1 ]
Leibowitz, M [1 ]
Hwang, C [1 ]
Gradman, AH [1 ]
Schleman, N [1 ]
Klibaner, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Presbyterian St Lukes Med Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
hypertension; treatment; enalapril; felodipine; Lexxel;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-7061(99)00051-5
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
To compare two popular strategies for intensifying treatment for hypertension, a double-blind, randomized, prospective, parallel-group, and partial crossover study was done. After 2 weeks of placebo run-in (baseline) and 3 weeks of 5 mg enalapril once daily, 217 patients were randomized to 6 weeks of treatment with either a low-dose combination therapy (5 mg enalapril + 5 mg felodipine ER once daily, Lexxel, Astra Merck, Inc.), or a higher dose of monotherapy (10 mg enalapril once daily, Vasotec, Merck & Co., Inc.). The group randomized to the combination had significantly greater reductions in sitting systolic/ diastolic blood pressure (BP)-14.2/10.6 mm Hg compared with baseline versus 9.6/7.4 mm Hg (P < .05/.01)-as well as a greater percentage of patients having achieved either diastolic BP < 90 mm Hg or a decline of at least 10 mm Hg (responders), 59% v 41% (P < .01). When patients originally taking 10 mg enalapril were crossed over to the combination therapy for a further 6 weeks, there was a further BP reduction and increase in response rate, with loss of significant differences compared with those treated continuously with the combination for the entire 12 weeks. The greater BP-lowering efficacy of the combination was independent of age, gender, and race. There were no significant differences in tolerability between the regimens. These data support the hypothesis that in patients who do not achieve goal BP reduction with a low dose of an antihypertensive agent, a combination of two drugs with complementary mechanisms of action is more effective than increasing the dose of the first agent. (C) 1999 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 696
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ARCH INTERN MED, V157, P2413, DOI DOI 10.1001/ARCHINTE.1997.00440420033005
[2]   AN ASSESSMENT OF DILTIAZEM AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN HYPERTENSION - APPLICATION OF FACTORIAL TRIAL DESIGN TO A MULTICENTER CLINICAL-TRIAL OF COMBINATION THERAPY [J].
BURRIS, JF ;
WEIR, MR ;
OPARIL, S ;
WEBER, M ;
CADY, WJ ;
STEWART, WH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (11) :1507-1512
[3]  
ELLIOTT WJ, 1998, CALCIUM ANTAGONISTS, P513
[4]   Newer approaches to antihypertensive therapy - Use of fixed-dose combination therapy [J].
Epstein, M ;
Bakris, G .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 156 (17) :1969-1978
[5]   A MULTIFACTORIAL TRIAL DESIGN TO ASSESS COMBINATION THERAPY IN HYPERTENSION - TREATMENT WITH BISOPROLOL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE [J].
FRISHMAN, WH ;
BRYZINSKI, BS ;
COULSON, LR ;
DEQUATTRO, VL ;
VLACHAKIS, ND ;
MROCZEK, WJ ;
DUKART, G ;
GOLDBERG, JD ;
ALEMAYEHU, D ;
KOURY, K .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 154 (13) :1461-1468
[6]   Combined enalapril and felodipine extended release (ER) for systemic hypertension [J].
Gradman, AH ;
Cutler, NR ;
Davis, PJ ;
Robbins, JA ;
Weiss, RJ ;
Wood, BC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (04) :431-435
[7]  
Gueyffier F, 1996, J HUM HYPERTENS, V10, P1
[8]  
MEDI INC, 1998, MED PRESCR PRIC GUID
[9]   FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS - DO THEY HAVE A ROLE IN RATIONAL THERAPY [J].
SICA, DA .
DRUGS, 1994, 48 (01) :16-24
[10]   Trends in antihypertensive drug use in the United States - Do the JNC V recommendations affect prescribing? [J].
Siegel, D ;
Lopez, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (21) :1745-1748