Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial

被引:133
作者
Halligan, Steve [1 ]
Wooldrage, Kate [2 ]
Dadswell, Edward [2 ]
Kralj-Hans, Ines [2 ]
von Wagner, Christian [1 ]
Edwards, Rob [3 ]
Yao, Guiqing [4 ]
Kay, Clive [5 ]
Burling, David [6 ]
Faiz, Omar [6 ]
Teare, Julian [7 ]
Lilford, Richard J. [4 ]
Morton, Dion [4 ]
Wardle, Jane [1 ]
Atkin, Wendy [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London NW1 2BU, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London, England
[3] Univ London, London, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Bradford Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
[6] St Marks Hosp, Harrow, Middx, England
[7] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
CT COLONOGRAPHY; VIRTUAL COLONOSCOPY; ACCEPTABILITY; METAANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62124-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background Barium enema (BE) is widely available for diagnosis of colorectal cancer despite concerns about its accuracy and acceptability. Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) might be a more sensitive and acceptable alternative. We aimed to compare CTC and BE for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients in clinical practice. Methods This pragmatic multicentre randomised trial recruited patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer from 21 UK hospitals. Eligible patients were aged 55 years or older and regarded by their referring clinician as suitable for radiological investigation of the colon. Patients were randomly assigned (2: 1) to BE or CTC by computer-generated random numbers, in blocks of six, stratified by trial centre and sex. We analysed the primary outcome-diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large (>= 10 mm) polyps-by intention to treat. The trial is an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number 95152621. Findings 3838 patients were randomly assigned to receive either BE (n=2553) or CTC (n=1285). 34 patients withdrew consent, leaving for analysis 2527 assigned to BE and 1277 assigned to CTC. The detection rate of colorectal cancer or large polyps was significantly higher in patients assigned to CTC than in those assigned to BE (93 [7.3%] of 1277 vs 141 [5.6%] of 2527, relative risk 1.31, 95% CI 1.01-1.68; p=0.0390). CTC missed three of 45 colorectal cancers and BE missed 12 of 85. The rate of additional colonic investigation was higher after CTC than after BE (283 [23.5%] of 1206 CTC patients had additional investigation vs 422 [18.3%] of 2300 BE patients; p=0.0003), due mainly to a higher polyp detection rate. Serious adverse events were rare. Interpretation CTC is a more sensitive test than BE. Our results suggest that CTC should be the preferred radiological test for patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1185 / 1193
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2009, ACR RPACT GUID PERF
[2]
Atkin W., 2013, Lancet
[3]
Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy [J].
Barish, MA ;
Soto, JA ;
Ferrucci, JT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (03) :786-792
[4]
Prospective comparison of patient experience with colon imaging tests [J].
Bosworth, Hayden B. ;
Rockey, Don C. ;
Paulson, Erik K. ;
Niedzwiecki, Donna ;
Davis, Wendy ;
Sanders, Linda L. ;
Yee, Judy ;
Henderson, Jim ;
Hatten, Paul ;
Burdick, Steve ;
Sanyal, Arun ;
Rubin, David T. ;
Sterling, Mark ;
Akerkar, Geetanjali ;
Bhutani, Manoop S. ;
Binmoeller, Kenneth ;
Garvie, John ;
Bini, Edmund J. ;
McQuaid, Kenneth ;
Foster, William L. ;
Thompson, William M. ;
Dachman, Abe ;
Halvorsen, Robert .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 119 (09) :791-799
[5]
CT colonography standards [J].
Burling, D. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 65 (06) :474-480
[6]
Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) - A multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia [J].
Cotton, PB ;
Durkalski, VL ;
Benoit, PC ;
Palesch, YY ;
Mauldin, PD ;
Hoffman, B ;
Vining, DJ ;
Small, WC ;
Affronti, J ;
Rex, D ;
Kopecky, KK ;
Ackerman, S ;
Burdick, JS ;
Brewington, C ;
Turner, MA ;
Zfass, A ;
Wright, AR ;
Iyer, RB ;
Lynch, P ;
Sivak, MV ;
Butler, H .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14) :1713-1719
[7]
Department of Health, DIAGN WAIT TIM ACT I
[8]
CT colonography: False-negative interpretations [J].
Doshi, Taral ;
Rusinak, David ;
Halvorsen, Robert A. ;
Rockey, Don C. ;
Suzuki, Kenji ;
Dachman, Abraham H. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (01) :165-173
[9]
CT colonography for detection of colon polyps and cancer [J].
Ferrucci, J .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9469) :1464-1465
[10]
Survey update on implementation, indications, and technical performance of computed tomography colonography in Sweden [J].
Fisichella, Valeria A. ;
Hellstrom, Mikael .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2010, 51 (01) :4-8