Effect of research activity on the success of American robin nests

被引:22
作者
Ortega, CP
Ortega, JC
Rapp, CA
Vorisek, S
Backensto, SA
Palmer, DW
机构
[1] Department of Biology, Fort Lewis College, Durango
[2] Department of Biological Sciences, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond
关键词
American robin; Colorado; eggs; nestlings; nests; nest success; observer effects; predation; predators; reproduction; research activity; Turdus migratorius;
D O I
10.2307/3802204
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We investigated researcher effects on the success of American robin (Turdus migratorius) nests from 1993 through 1995 in Ld Plata County, southwest Colorado. We handled the contents of 56 nests in 1993; 33 nests in 1994, and 20 nests in 1995. In these nests, which we refer to as ''touched nests,'' each egg was handled one time, and each chick mas handled for about 3 minutes every 1-3 days. We made no attempt to mask our scent, such as with use Of rubber gloves. With the use of a mirror on an extension pole, we monitored an additional 14 nests in 1993, 12 nests in 1994, and 21 nests in 1995 that we did not touch. Although we monitored nests that we could not reach, in the analyses we included only nests that we could have touched, less than or equal to 3.7 m high. In 1993, a significantly greater proportion of touched nests was successful in fledging at least one robin (57.1%) than untouched nests (21.4%, P < 0.05). Similarly, in 1994, 60.6% of touched nests were successful whereas 8.3% of untouched nests were successful (P < 0.01). In 1995, when we controlled for nest height by touching every other nest that was less than or equal to 3.7 m, success between touched and untouched nests was similar (35.0% for touched nests and 23.8% for untouched nests). Our results strongly suggest that monitoring nests and handling eggs and chicks did not affect negatively the success of American robin nests at our study site.
引用
收藏
页码:948 / 952
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
BART J, 1977, Living Bird, V16, P187
[2]  
Burger J., 1981, Colonial Waterbirds, V4, P28, DOI 10.2307/1521108
[3]  
CAIRNS D, 1980, WILSON BULL, V92, P352
[4]  
CONOVER MR, 1978, P COLONIAL WATERBIRD, V2, P41
[5]  
DesGranges J.-L., 1981, Colonial Waterbirds, V4, P12, DOI 10.2307/1521106
[6]  
Fetterolf P.M., 1981, Colonial Waterbirds, V4, P68, DOI 10.2307/1521114
[7]   MARKING AND VISITING LAPWING VANELLUS-VANELLUS NESTS DOES NOT AFFECT CLUTCH SURVIVAL [J].
GALBRAITH, H .
BIRD STUDY, 1987, 34 :137-137
[8]  
GOTTFRIED BM, 1978, AUK, V95, P304
[9]  
HAMMOND M. C, 1956, JOUR WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, V20, P243, DOI 10.2307/3796957
[10]   ECOLOGICAL FACTORS AFFECTING NEST BUILDING IN RED-WINGED BLACKBIRDS [J].
HOLCOMB, LC ;
TWIEST, G .
BIRD-BANDING, 1968, 39 (01) :14-&