Evaluation of four sampling methods for determining exposure of children to lead-contaminated household dust

被引:39
作者
Sterling, DA
Roegner, KC
Lewis, RD
Luke, DA
Wilder, LC
Burchette, SM
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Environm & Occupat Hlth, St Louis, MO 63108 USA
[2] Agcy Tox Subst & Dis Registry, Div Hlth Assessment & Consultat, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] US EPA, Environm Response Team, Edison, NJ USA
关键词
lead; dust sampling methods; exposure assessment; wipe sampling; vacuum sampling; blood lead; sample location;
D O I
10.1006/enrs.1999.3962
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Childhood exposure to lead has been demonstrated to result in health effects and lead-contaminated household dust is a primary exposure source. There is a need to establish reliable methods for sampling surfaces to determine levels of lead contamination, Three vacuums (HVS3, GS80, and MVM) and one wipe method were evaluated for the collection of household floor dust under field sampling conditions within a Superfund site and demographically similar control area, Side-by-side floor samples were taken from three locations within 41 randomly selected households between August and September 1995: a child's bedroom, primary play area, and primary entrance. Analysis was pel formed to assess the relative collection performance of each sampler, spatial distribution of lead within a household, and correlation of lead loading with observed blood lead level, and to determine if discrete- or composites samples were more predictive of blood lead levels, Approximately 90% of the floor surfaces were carpeted, The rank order of sampling methods from greatest to lowest collection efficiency was HVS3 > GS80 > wipe > MVM, The HVS3 had the highest level of precision (CV = 0.05), with the GS80 and wipe precisions 0.48 and 0.053, respectively, Lead loadings for samples collected in bedrooms and living areas and composite samples using the HVS3 and wipe methods were significantly correlated with blood lead levels. Correlations between blood lead levels and composite samples were stronger for the HVS3 (R-2 = 0.33, P = 0.003) and wipe (R-2 = 0.25, P = 0.002) methods than the respective discrete samples. Regression analysis indicated that a blood lead level of 10 mu g/dl corresponds to a carpet wipe sample geometric mean of 68 mu g/ft(2). For ongoing public health purposes, such as screening and clearance testing, use of the wipe sampling method is the most appropriate. This investigation supports findings by others that the present HUD risk levels for lead in floor wipe samples may not be adequate for reducing children's blood lead levels below 10 mu g/dl. (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 141
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
*ASTM, 1993, 543894 ASTM D
[2]  
*ATSDR, 1988, NAT EXT LEAD POIS CH
[3]   ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE TO LEAD AND CHILDRENS INTELLIGENCE AT THE AGE OF 7 YEARS - THE PORT-PIRIE COHORT STUDY [J].
BAGHURST, PA ;
MCMICHAEL, AJ ;
WIGG, NR ;
VIMPANI, GV ;
ROBERTSON, EF ;
ROBERTS, RJ ;
TONG, SL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (18) :1279-1284
[4]  
Calabrese E.J., 1992, J SOIL CONTAM, V1, P253
[5]  
*CDCP CDC, 1991, PREV LEAD POIS YOUNG
[6]  
Clark S., 1995, APPL OCCUP ENV HYG, V10, P107
[7]   LEAD IN PLAYGROUND DUST AND ON THE HANDS OF SCHOOLCHILDREN [J].
DUGGAN, MJ ;
INSKIP, MJ ;
RUNDLE, SA ;
MOORCROFT, JS .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1985, 44 (01) :65-79
[8]   Measurement error and its impact on the estimated relationship between dust lead and children's blood lead [J].
Emond, MJ ;
Lanphear, BP ;
Watts, A ;
Eberly, S ;
Weitzman, M ;
Clarkson, T ;
Winter, NL ;
Aptez, L ;
Yakir, B ;
Galke, W ;
Jacobs, D ;
Matte, T ;
Clark, S ;
Farfel, M ;
Graef, J ;
Schwartz, J ;
Silbergeld, E .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 72 (01) :82-92
[9]  
Environmental Protection Agency (US), 1998, FED REGISTER, V63, p[106, 30302]
[10]  
*EPA, 1995, FIN REP SAMPL HOUS D