Willingness to pay for poison control centers

被引:39
作者
Phillips, KA
Homan, RK
Luft, HS
Hiatt, PH
Olson, KR
Kearney, TE
Heard, SE
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,CTR AIDS PREVENT STUDIES,PREVENT SCI GRP,SAN FRANCISCO,CA
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT GEN INTERNAL MED,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[3] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,SCH PHARM,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[4] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DIV CLIN PHARMACOL,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
关键词
cost analysis; willingness-to-pay; public goods; preventive health care; injury prevention;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-6296(96)00521-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We used the willingness-to-pay (WTP) method to value the benefits of poison control centers when direct access was blocked, comparing WTP among: (I) blocked callers (n = 396), (2) callers after access was restored (n = 418), and (3) the general population (n = 119). Mean monthly WTP was $6.70 (blocked callers), $6.11 (non-blocked callers), and $2.55 (general population). Blocked and non-blocked callers had a significantly higher WTP than general population respondents (p < 0.001). We conclude that the WTP method measured benefits that are difficult to quantify; however, WTP surveys need to be carefully conducted to minimize bias. We discuss how this approach could be useful for other health care services. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 357
页数:15
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   WHAT DO PATIENTS VALUE - WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR ULTRASOUND IN NORMAL-PREGNANCY [J].
BERWICK, DM ;
WEINSTEIN, MC .
MEDICAL CARE, 1985, 23 (07) :881-893
[2]  
Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
[3]  
DAVIS RK, 1963, NAT RESOUR J, V3, P239
[4]  
Desvousges W.H ., 1983, COMP ALTERNATIVE APP
[5]   CONTINGENT VALUATION - IS SOME NUMBER BETTER THAN NO NUMBER [J].
DIAMOND, PA ;
HAUSMAN, JA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 8 (04) :45-64
[8]   WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY AS A MEASURE OF BENEFITS - RELEVANT QUESTIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC DECISION-MAKING ABOUT HEALTH-CARE PROGRAMS [J].
GAFNI, A .
MEDICAL CARE, 1991, 29 (12) :1246-1252
[9]   VALUING THE ENVIRONMENT THROUGH CONTINGENT VALUATION [J].
HANEMANN, WM .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1994, 8 (04) :19-43
[10]   ECONOMIC-EVALUATION IN HEALTH-CARE - IS THERE A ROLE FOR COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS [J].
JOHANNESSON, M ;
JONSSON, B .
HEALTH POLICY, 1991, 17 (01) :1-23