When Apologies for Injustice Matter The Role of Respect

被引:46
作者
De Cremer, David [1 ,3 ]
Schouten, Barbara C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Ctr Justice & Social Decis Making JuST, Dept Social Psychol, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Commun Sci, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
apologies; social accounts; trust repair; respect; injustice; self-esteem;
D O I
10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.239
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The present research examined the idea that the effectiveness of apologies on promoting fairness perceptions depends on how meaningful and sincere the apology is experienced. More precisely, it was predicted that apologies are more effective when they are communicated by an authority being respectful to others. A study using a cross-sectional organizational survey showed that an apology (relative to giving no apology) revealed higher fairness perceptions, but only so when the authority was respectful rather than disrespectful. In a subsequent experimental laboratory study the same interaction effect (as in Study 1) on fairness perceptions was found. In addition, a similar interaction effect also emerged on participants' self-evaluations in terms of relational appreciation (i.e., feeling valued and likeable). Finally, these self-evaluations accounted (at least partly) for the interactive effect on fairness perceptions.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 247
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
[2]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[3]   THE NEED TO BELONG - DESIRE FOR INTERPERSONAL ATTACHMENTS AS A FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN-MOTIVATION [J].
BAUMEISTER, RF ;
LEARY, MR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 117 (03) :497-529
[4]  
BIES RJ, 1987, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V9, P289
[5]  
Bobocel DR, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE, P469
[6]   An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures [J].
Brockner, J ;
Wiesenfeld, BM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 120 (02) :189-208
[7]   The moderating effect of self-esteem in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from five studies [J].
Brockner, J ;
Heuer, L ;
Siegel, PA ;
Wiesenfeld, B ;
Martin, C ;
Grover, S ;
Reed, T ;
Bjorgvinsson, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (02) :394-407
[8]   The utility of experimental research in the study of transformational/charismatic leadership [J].
Brown, DJ ;
Lord, RG .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 1999, 10 (04) :531-539
[9]   On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure [J].
Colquitt, JA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) :386-400
[10]   CHILDRENS REACTIONS TO TRANSGRESSIONS - EFFECTS OF THE ACTORS APOLOGY, REPUTATION AND REMORSE [J].
DARBY, BW ;
SCHLENKER, BR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 28 :353-364