Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection

被引:114
作者
Dashe, JS
McIntire, DD
Ramus, RM
Santos-Ramos, R
Twickler, DM
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(02)01935-X
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate gestational age at ultrasound detection of placenta previa as a predictor of previa persistence until delivery, and to estimate the effects of previa type, parity, and prior cesarean delivery on previa persistence. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnancies with placenta previa detected during transabdominal or endovaginal ultrasound examination. Previa was categorized as complete if the placenta completely covered the internal cervical os or incomplete if the inferior placental edge partially covered or reached the margin of the os. Gestational age was grouped into 4-week intervals from 15 to 36 weeks. The outcome was cesarean delivery for persistent previa. RESULTS: Previa was detected during 940 ultrasound examinations in 714 pregnancies. Of those with placenta previa at 15-19 weeks, 20-23 weeks, 24-27 weeks, 28-31 weeks, and 32-35 weeks, previa persisted until delivery in 12%, 34%, 49%, 62%, and 73%, respectively. At each interval, complete previa was more likely to persist than incomplete previa, all P < .001. Prior cesarean delivery was an independent risk factor for persistent previa among women diagnosed with previa in the second trimester, P < .05. However, parity was not an independent risk factor for persistence at any gestational age interval after adjusting for prior cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Gestational age at ultrasound detection of placenta previa may be used to predict likelihood of previa persistence. After midpregnancy, risk of persistence appears to be higher than previously reported. Type of placentation and prior cesarean delivery are important factors that modify the risk that previa will complicate delivery. (Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:692-7. (C) 2002 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists).
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 697
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: A metaanalysis [J].
Ananth, CV ;
Smulian, JC ;
Vintzileos, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (05) :1071-1078
[2]  
COMEAU J, 1983, OBSTET GYNECOL, V61, P577
[3]  
DAWSON WB, 1996, J ULTRAS MED, V15, P443
[4]   ULTRASONIC PLACENTOGRAPHY - A NEW METHOD FOR PLACENTAL LOCALIZATION [J].
GOTTESFELD, KR ;
THOMPSON, HE ;
HOLMES, JH ;
TAYLOR, ES .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1966, 96 (04) :538-+
[5]  
HARRIS RD, 2000, ULTRASONOGRAPHY OBST, P597
[6]   PLACENTAL MIGRATION DEMONSTRATED BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY - HYPOTHESIS OF DYNAMIC PLACENTATION [J].
KING, DL .
RADIOLOGY, 1973, 109 (01) :167-170
[7]   The use of second-trimester transvaginal sonography to predict placenta previa [J].
Lauria, MR ;
Smith, RS ;
Treadwell, MC ;
Comstock, CH ;
Kirk, JS ;
Lee, W ;
Bottoms, SF .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 8 (05) :337-340
[8]   ACCURACY AND SAFETY OF TRANSVAGINAL SONOGRAPHIC PLACENTAL LOCALIZATION [J].
LEERENTVELD, RA ;
GILBERTS, ECAM ;
ARNOLD, MJCWJ ;
WLADIMIROFF, JW .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 76 (05) :759-762
[9]   First-birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth [J].
Lydon-Rochelle, M ;
Holt, VL ;
Easterling, TR ;
Martin, DP .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (05) :765-769
[10]   Diagnosis of placenta previa by transvaginal sonographic screening at 12-16 weeks in a nonselected population [J].
Taipale, P ;
Hiilesmaa, V ;
Ylostalo, P .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (03) :364-367