Measuring the cohesiveness of preferences: an axiomatic analysis

被引:22
作者
Alcalde-Unzu, Jorge [1 ]
Vorsatz, Marc [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Publ Navarra, Dept Econ, Pamplona 31006, Spain
[2] Univ Nacl Educ Distancia, Dept Anal Econ 2, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[3] Fdn Estudios Econ Aplicada FEDEA, Madrid 28001, Spain
关键词
MEASURING CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1007/s00355-012-0716-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we axiomatically study how to measure the similarity of preferences in a group of individuals. For simplicity, we refer to this as the cohesiveness. First, we provide axioms that characterize a family of linear and additive measures whose intersection is a partial ordinal criterion similar to first order stochastic dominance. The introduction of some additional properties isolates a one-parameter subfamily. This parameter evaluates the effect on the cohesiveness if one individual changes his ranking on a single pair of objects, as a function of how many of the remaining individuals in the group rank the first object over the second and vice versa. Finally, we characterize the focal measures of this subfamily separately showing that they coincide with measures constructed using two, at first sight, totally different approaches suggested in the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:965 / 988
页数:24
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Alcalde-Unzu J, 2011, STUD FUZZ SOFT COMP, V267, P195
[2]   MEASUREMENT OF INEQUALITY [J].
ATKINSON, AB .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1970, 2 (03) :244-263
[3]   Assent-maximizing social choice [J].
Baldiga, Katherine A. ;
Green, Jerry R. .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2013, 40 (02) :439-460
[4]  
Blackorby C., 2005, POPULATION ISSUES SO, DOI DOI 10.1017/CCOL0521825512
[5]  
Bosch R., 2006, THESIS TILBURG U
[6]   ON THE BORDA-KENDALL CONSENSUS METHOD FOR PRIORITY RANKING PROBLEMS [J].
COOK, WD ;
SEIFORD, LM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1982, 28 (06) :621-637
[7]  
Cowell F.A., 2008, MEASURING INEQUALITY
[8]   A measure of segregation based on social interactions [J].
Echenique, Federico ;
Fryer, Roland G., Jr. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2007, 122 (02) :441-485
[9]  
Eckert D., 2006, Central European Journal of Operations Research, V14, P377
[10]  
Eisenberg J., 2007, ENCYCLOPAEDIA SOCIAL, P386, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412956253.N237