Empirical antibiotic monotherapy for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:137
作者
Paul, M
Yahav, D
Fraser, A
Leibovici, L
机构
[1] Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Med E, IL-49100 Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
beta-lactams; cefepime; ceftazidime; piperacillin; tazobactam; carbapenems;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dki448
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: Early, empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment is the established practice for febrile neutropenia. Several beta-lactams are accepted for monotherapy. We asked whether patients' outcomes are influenced by the chosen beta-lactam. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams administered as empirical monotherapy for febrile neutropenia, with or without vancomycin. The search included The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Lilacs databases, bibliography, conference proceedings, trial registries and FDA new drug approvals. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed quality assessment and extracted the data. Trials assessing the same beta-lactam were pooled using the fixed effect model. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The primary outcome assessed was all-cause mortality. Results: Thirty-three trials fulfilled inclusion criteria. Cefepime was associated with higher all-cause mortality at 30 days than other beta-lactams (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.06-1.94, 3123 participants). Carbapenems were associated with fewer treatment modifications, including addition of glycopeptides, than ceftazidime or other comparators. Adverse events were significantly more frequent with carbapenems, specifically pseudomembranous colitis (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.24-3.04, 2025 participants). All-cause mortality was unaltered. Piperacillin/tazobactam was compared only with cefepime and carbapenems, in six trials. No significant differences were demonstrated with paucity of data for all-cause mortality. Conclusions: The use of cefepime for febrile neutropenia is associated with increased mortality and should be carefully considered pending further analysis. Empirical use of carbapenems entails fewer treatment modifications, but an increased rate of pseudomembranous colitis. Ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem/cilastatin and meropenem appear to be suitable agents for monotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 189
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Alderson P., 2004, COCHRANE REV HDB 4 2
[2]   RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF BETA-LACTAM REGIMENS IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
ANAISSIE, EJ ;
FAINSTEIN, V ;
BODEY, GP ;
ROLSTON, K ;
ELTING, L ;
KANTARJIAN, H ;
CABANILLAS, F ;
MCCREDIE, KB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 84 (03) :581-589
[3]  
AOUN M, 2005, 50679SE1002 NDA
[4]   Randomised comparison of ceftazidime and imipenem as initial monotherapy for febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients [J].
Aparicio, J ;
Oltra, A ;
Llorca, C ;
Montalar, J ;
Herranz, C ;
GomezCodina, J ;
Pastor, M ;
Munarriz, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (10) :1739-1743
[5]  
BICKERS J, 1990, CLIN RES, V38, pA991
[6]   Cefepime versus imipenem-cilastatin as empirical monotherapy in 400 febrile patients with short duration neutropenia [J].
Biron, P ;
Fuhrmann, C ;
Cure, H ;
Viens, P ;
Lefebvre, D ;
Thyss, A ;
Viot, M ;
Soler-Michel, P ;
Rollin, C ;
Grès, JJ .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 42 (04) :511-518
[7]   Imipenem or cefoperazone-sulbactam combined with vancomycin for therapy of presumed or proven infection in neutropenic cancer patients [J].
Bodey, G ;
AbiSaid, D ;
Rolston, K ;
Raad, I ;
Whimbey, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1996, 15 (08) :625-634
[8]  
BODEY GP, 1990, CANCER, V65, P9, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900101)65:1<9::AID-CNCR2820650105>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-C
[10]   ESCHERICHIA-COLI BACTEREMIA IN CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
BODEY, GP ;
ELTING, L ;
KASSAMALI, H ;
LIM, BP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 81 (1A) :85-95