Is willingness to pay for a public good sensitive to the elicitation format?

被引:55
作者
Champ, PA [1 ]
Bishop, RC
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Agr & Appl Econ, Madison, WI USA
关键词
D O I
10.3368/le.82.2.162
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study uses actual payments toward the provision of a public good to compare dichotomous choice and payment card formats. The public good in question is the environmental improvement from wind generation of electric power. We find that willingness-to-pay estimates vary with the elicitation format. Based on this result, we argue that elicitation effects found in contingent valuation studies may not be due the hypothetical nature of decision-making, as has been suggested in previous studies.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 173
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   OPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR DISCRETE-CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS - SINGLE-BOUND, DOUBLE-BOUND, AND BIVARIATE MODELS [J].
ALBERINI, A .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 28 (03) :287-306
[2]   An assessment of household willingness to pay for curbside recycling: A comparison of payment card and referendum approaches [J].
Blaine, TW ;
Lichtkoppler, FR ;
Jones, KR ;
Zondag, RH .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 76 (01) :15-22
[3]   Effects of total cost and group-size information on willingness to pay responses: Open ended vs dichotomous choice [J].
Bohara, AK ;
McKee, M ;
Berrens, RP ;
Jenkins-Smith, H ;
Silva, CL ;
Brookshire, DS .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 35 (02) :142-163
[4]   Valuing public goods: Discrete versus continuous contingent-valuation responses [J].
Boyle, KJ ;
Johnson, FR ;
McCollum, DW ;
Desvousges, WH ;
Dunford, RW ;
Hudson, SP .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1996, 72 (03) :381-396
[5]   Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good? [J].
Brown, TC ;
Champ, PA ;
Bishop, RC ;
McCollum, DW .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1996, 72 (02) :152-166
[6]   Voluntary provision of threshold public goods with continuous contributions: experimental evidence [J].
Cadsby, CB ;
Maynes, E .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1999, 71 (01) :53-73
[7]   OLS VERSUS ML ESTIMATION OF NON-MARKET RESOURCE VALUES WITH PAYMENT CARD INTERVAL DATA [J].
CAMERON, TA ;
HUPPERT, DD .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1989, 17 (03) :230-246
[8]   Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: Are the underlying preferences the same? [J].
Cameron, TA ;
Poe, GL ;
Ethier, RG ;
Schulze, WD .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 44 (03) :391-425
[9]  
CARSON RT, 2000, KOB C THEOR APPL ENV
[10]   Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: An empirical study of hypothetical bias [J].
Champ, PA ;
Bishop, RC .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (04) :383-402