Magnetic resonance imaging or arthrography of the shoulder: Which do patients prefer?

被引:27
作者
Blanchard, TK
Bearcroft, PW
Dixon, AK
Lomas, DJ
Teale, A
Constant, CR
Hazleman, BL
机构
[1] ADDENBROOKES HOSP,DEPT ORTHOPAED,CAMBRIDGE CB2 2QQ,ENGLAND
[2] ADDENBROOKES HOSP,DEPT RHEUMATOL,CAMBRIDGE CB2 2QQ,ENGLAND
[3] UNIV CAMBRIDGE,CAMBRIDGE CB2 2QQ,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr.70.836.9486041
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
110 consecutive patients were asked about their degree of anxiety (SAI scores), pain (VAS scores) and preferences at various stages before and after imaging in order to determine whether patients with shoulder problems prefer MRI or shoulder arthrography. 88 patients underwent MRI, 42 arthrography and 19 both. Mean levels of anxiety were slightly higher for patients undergoing MRI. than those having arthrography, but this difference was not statistically significant. There was a statistically significant (p<0.03) reduction in anxiety after arthrography, but not following MRI. Pain scores fell for both patient groups while at rest during the imaging procedure compared with their pre-imaging baseline measurement. This was statistically significant (p<0.03) for MRI, but not for arthrography. A significantly higher proportion (p<0.001) of patients found MRI unpleasant or extremely unpleasant (20/77) compared with arthrography (3/41). Of the 25 patients who expressed a preference on the basis of past or current experience, 11 preferred MRI and 14 arthrography (NS). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who would not allow the test to be repeated (29/73 for MRI, 15/39 for arthrography). Although there were minor differences in both the anxiety and pain experienced by patients undergoing MRI and arthrography, this study did not reveal any firm preference for either investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:786 / 790
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder: Assessment of effectiveness
    Blanchard, TK
    Mackenzie, R
    Bearcroft, PWP
    Sinnatamby, R
    Gray, A
    Lomas, DJ
    Constant, CR
    Dixon, AK
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (05) : 363 - 368
  • [2] BRENNAN SC, 1988, LANCET, V2, P512
  • [3] GACHTER A, 1992, Arthroscopy, V8, P89, DOI 10.1016/0749-8063(92)90141-W
  • [4] APPLIED MRI ANATOMY OF THE SHOULDER
    HO, CP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1993, 18 (01) : 351 - 359
  • [5] MASSIVE ROTATOR CUFF TEARS - SCREENING BY ROUTINE RADIOGRAPHS
    KANEKO, K
    DEMOUY, EH
    BRUNET, ME
    [J]. CLINICAL IMAGING, 1995, 19 (01) : 8 - 11
  • [6] CLINICAL EFFICACY OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN NEUROIMAGING
    KENT, DL
    HAYNOR, DR
    LONGSTRETH, WT
    LARSON, EB
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 120 (10) : 856 - 871
  • [7] MEASURING THE EFFECTS OF IMAGING - AN EVALUATIVE FRAMEWORK
    MACKENZIE, R
    DIXON, AK
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1995, 50 (08) : 513 - 518
  • [8] PATIENTS PERCEPTIONS OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    MACKENZIE, R
    SIMS, C
    OWENS, RG
    DIXON, AK
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1995, 50 (03) : 137 - 143
  • [9] ANXIETY-RELATED REACTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING EXAMINATIONS
    MELENDEZ, JC
    MCCRANK, E
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (06): : 745 - 747
  • [10] MIDDLETON WD, 1994, TOP MAGN RESON IMAG, V6, P133