An empirical analysis of determinants of retailer pricing strategy

被引:127
作者
Shankar, V [1 ]
Bolton, RN
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Robert H Smith Sch Business, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Owen Grad Sch Management, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
关键词
retailing; pricing; promotion; competitive strategy; econometric analysis;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.1030.0034
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper empirically investigates the determinants of retailers' pricing decisions. It finds that competitor factors explain the most variance in retailer pricing strategy. Only in the cases of price-promotion coordination and relative brand price do category and chain factors explain much variance in retailer pricing. These findings are derived from a simultaneous equation model of how underlying dimensions of retailers' pricing strategies are influenced by variables representing the market, chain, store, category, brand, customer, and competition. The optical scanner data base describes 1,364 brand-store combinations from six categories of consumer packaged goods in five U.S. markets over a two-year time period. Our study classifies retailers' pricing strategies based on four underlying dimensions: price consistency, price-promotion intensity, price-promotion coordination, and relative brand price. These four pricing dimensions are statistically related to: (1) competitor price and deal frequency (competitor factors), (2) storability and necessity (category factors), (3) chain positioning and size (chain factors), (4) store size and assortment (store factors), (5) brand preference and advertising (brand factors), and (6) own-price and deal elasticities (customer factors). These findings are useful to retailers profiling alternative pricing strategies, and to manufacturers customizing the levels of marketing support spending for different retailers.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 49
页数:22
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Market response to a major policy change in the marketing mix: Learning from Procter & Gamble's value pricing strategy [J].
Ailawadi, KL ;
Lehmann, DR ;
Neslin, SA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2001, 65 (01) :44-61
[2]   Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: Store brands versus national brand promotions [J].
Ailawadi, KL ;
Neslin, SA ;
Gedenk, K .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2001, 65 (01) :71-89
[3]   THE INFLUENCE OF PRIOR BELIEFS, FREQUENCY CUES, AND MAGNITUDE CUES ON CONSUMERS PERCEPTIONS OF COMPARATIVE PRICE DATA [J].
ALBA, JW ;
BRONIARCZYK, SM ;
SHIMP, TA ;
URBANY, JE .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1994, 21 (02) :219-235
[4]  
BAWA K, 1989, J RETAILING, V65, P471
[5]   The decomposition of promotional response: An empirical generalization [J].
Bell, DR ;
Chiang, JW ;
Padmanabhan, V .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1999, 18 (04) :504-526
[6]   Shopping behavior and consumer preference for store price format: Why "large basket" shoppers prefer EDLP [J].
Bell, DR ;
Lattin, JM .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1998, 17 (01) :66-88
[7]  
Blattberg R.C., 1989, MARKET LETT, V1, P81, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00436151
[8]  
Blattberg RobertC., 1990, SALES PROMOTIONS CON
[9]   An empirically derived taxonomy of retailer pricing and promotion strategies [J].
Bolton, RN ;
Shankar, V .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2003, 79 (04) :213-224
[10]  
BOLTON RN, 1989, J RETAILING, V65, P193