The interactive examination:: assessing students' self-assessment ability

被引:71
作者
Mattheos, N [1 ]
Nattestad, A
Falk-Nilsson, E
Attström, R
机构
[1] Malmo Univ, Ctr Oral Hlth Sci, Dept Periodontol, S-20506 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Lund Univ, Univ Ctr Teaching & Learning, Lund, Sweden
[4] Univ Bern, Dept Periodontol & Fixed Prosthodont, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
clinical competence; standards; education; medical; undergraduate; educational measurement; self evaluation programmes; methods; students; faculty; reproducibility of results; comparative study;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01788.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The ability to self-assess one's competence is a crucial skill for all health professionals. The interactive examination is an assessment model aiming to evaluate not only students' clinical skills and competence, but also their ability to self-assess their proficiency. METHODS The methodology utilised students' own self-assessment, an answer to a written essay question and a group discussion. Students' self-assessment was matched to the judgement of their instructors. As a final task, students compared their own essay to one written by an 'expert'. The differences pointed by students in their comparison documents and the accompanying arguments were analysed and categorised. Students received individual feedback on their performance and learning needs. The model was tested on 1 cohort of undergraduate dental students (year 2001, n = 52) in their third semester of studies, replacing an older form of examination in the discipline of clinical periodontology. RESULTS Students' acceptance of the methodology was very positive. Students tended to overestimate their competence in relation to the judgement of their instructors in diagnostic skills, but not in skills relevant to treatment. No gender differences were observed, although females performed better than males in the examination. Three categories of differences were observed in the students' comparison documents. The accompanying arguments may reveal students' understanding and methods of prioritising. CONCLUSIONS Students tended to overestimate their competence in diagnostic rather than treatment skills. The interactive examination appeared to be a convenient tool for providing deeper insight into students' ability to prioritise, self-assess and steer their own learning.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 389
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Abrams R G, 1974, J Dent Educ, V28, P385
[2]  
ARNOLD L, 1985, J MED EDUC, V60, P21
[3]  
Brown G., 1997, ASSESSING STUDENT LE, P170
[4]  
Cunningham M A, 1985, Gerontol Geriatr Educ, V6, P17
[5]   Self and tutor evaluations in problem-based learning tutorials: is there a relationship? [J].
Das, M ;
Mpofu, D ;
Dunn, E ;
Lanphear, JH .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1998, 32 (04) :411-418
[6]  
EPSTEIN L, 1994, ANN COMMUNITY ORIENT, V7, P389
[7]  
Ericson D, 1997, Eur J Dent Educ, V1, P123, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0579.1997.tb00021.x
[8]   STUDENT SELF-ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER-EDUCATION - A METAANALYSIS [J].
FALCHIKOV, N ;
BOUD, D .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1989, 59 (04) :395-430
[9]   RELATIONSHIPS OF INTERNS PERFORMANCES TO THEIR SELF-ASSESSMENTS OF THEIR PREPAREDNESS FOR INTERNSHIP AND TO THEIR ACADEMIC PERFORMANCES IN MEDICAL-SCHOOL [J].
FINCHER, RME ;
LEWIS, LA ;
KUSKE, TT .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1993, 68 (02) :S47-S50
[10]  
Geissler P R, 1973, J Dent Educ, V37, P19