2.5D forward and inverse modeling for interpreting low-frequency electromagnetic measurements

被引:218
作者
Abubakar, A. [1 ]
Habashy, T. M. [1 ]
Druskin, V. L. [1 ]
Knizhnerman, L. [2 ]
Alumbaugh, D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Schlumberger Doll Res Ctr, Cambridge, MA USA
[2] Ctr Geophys Expedit, Moscow, Russia
[3] Schlumberger EMI, Richmond, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1190/1.2937466
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We present 2.5D fast and rigorous forward and inversion algorithms for deep electromagnetic (EM) applications that include crosswell and controlled-source EM measurements. The forward algorithm is based on a finite-difference approach in which a multifrontal LU decomposition algorithm simulates multisource experiments at nearly the cost of simulating one single-source experiment for each frequency of operation. When the size of the linear system of equations is large, the use of this noniterative solver is impractical. Hence, we use the optimal grid technique to limit the number of unknowns in the forward problem. The inversion algorithm employs a regularized Gauss-Newton minimization approach with a multiplicative cost function. By using this multiplicative cost function, we do not need a priori data to determine the so-called regularization parameter in the optimization process, making the algorithm fully automated. The algorithm is equipped with two regularization cost functions that allow us to reconstruct either a smooth or a sharp conductivity image. To increase the robustness of the algorithm, we also constrain the minimization and use a line-search approach to guarantee the reduction of the cost function after each iteration. To demonstrate the pros and cons of the algorithm, we present synthetic and field data inversion results for crosswell and controlled-source EM measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:F165 / F177
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Abubakar A, 2006, GEOPHYS J INT, V165, P744, DOI 10.1111/J.1365-246X.2005.02816.X
[2]   Three-dimensional inverse scattering applied to cross-well induction sensors [J].
Abubakar, A ;
van den Berg, PM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2000, 38 (04) :1669-1681
[3]   SOLUTION OF 2.5-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEMS USING THE LANCZOS DECOMPOSITION [J].
ALLERS, A ;
SEZGINER, A ;
DRUSKIN, VL .
RADIO SCIENCE, 1994, 29 (04) :955-963
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1 BREAK
[5]   Total variation blind deconvolution [J].
Chan, TF ;
Wong, CK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1998, 7 (03) :370-375
[6]   Deterministic edge-preserving regularization in computed imaging [J].
Charbonnier, P ;
BlancFeraud, L ;
Aubert, G ;
Barlaud, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1997, 6 (02) :298-311
[7]   An introduction to marine controlled-source electromagnetic methods for hydrocarbon exploration [J].
Constable, Steven ;
Srnka, Leonard J. .
GEOPHYSICS, 2007, 72 (02) :WA3-WA12
[8]   An unsymmetric-pattern multifrontal method for sparse LU factorization [J].
Davis, TA ;
Duff, IS .
SIAM JOURNAL ON MATRIX ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, 1997, 18 (01) :140-158
[9]  
DAVIS TA, 2007, DIRECT METHODS SPARS
[10]  
Dennis, 1996, NUMERICAL METHODS UN