The green side of protectionism: Environmental concerns and three facets of trade policy preferences

被引:44
作者
Bechtel, Michael M. [1 ,3 ]
Bernauer, Thomas [1 ,3 ]
Meyer, Reto [2 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Ctr Comparat & Int Studies, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Sociol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
International trade; trade policy preferences; environment; protectionism; environmental concerns; individual data; ECOLOGICAL ATTITUDES; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; GLOBALIZATION; FOREIGN; LIBERALIZATION; COUNTRIES; SUPPORT; PEOPLE; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/09692290.2011.611054
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A large literature in international political economy views individuals trade policy preferences as a function of the income effects of economic openness. We argue that the expected environmental consequences of free trade play a noteworthy role for protectionist attitudes that has not been noted so far. We use unique Swiss survey data that contain measures of individuals environmental concerns and different aspects of trade policy preferences to examine whether those who are more concerned about the environment also hold more protectionist trade policy preferences. Our results support this expectation. Individuals who are more concerned about the environment tend to think that globalization has more negative than positive effects, more strongly support jobs-related protectionism, and place more emphasis on aspects that go beyond price and quality when evaluating foreign products. Our results suggest that also the expected environmental consequences of free trade matter for trade policy preferences and not just the potential effects on the domestic wage distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 866
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Anderson K., 1992, The Greening of World Trade Issues
[2]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[3]   Who wants to globalize? Consumer tastes and labor markets in a theory of trade policy beliefs [J].
Baker, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 49 (04) :924-938
[4]   Changing Economic Openness for Environmental Policy Convergence: When Can Bilateral Trade Agreements Induce Convergence of Environmental Regulation? [J].
Bechtel, Michael M. ;
Tosun, Jale .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2009, 53 (04) :931-953
[5]   Effects of political institutions on air quality [J].
Bernauer, Thomas ;
Koubi, Vally .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (05) :1355-1365
[6]  
Bernauer Thomas., 2004, J PUBLIC POLICY, V24, P99, DOI [10.1017/S0143814X04000054, DOI 10.1017/S0143814X04000054, 10.1017/s0143814x04000054]
[7]  
Bhagwati J., 2002, FREE TRADE TODAY
[8]   Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses [J].
Brambor, T ;
Clark, WR ;
Golder, M .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (01) :63-82
[9]   Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms [J].
Braumoeller, BF .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2004, 58 (04) :807-820
[10]  
Bryan D., 2007, NATL GLOBAL SOLIDARI, P41