Opinion of New Zealand physicians on management of acute ischaemic stroke: results of a national survey

Background: Randomised trials have evaluated various treatments for acute ischaemic stroke, but it is unclear how the results of these studies are used in everyday practice. Aims: To obtain the opinions of physicians on the management of acute ischaemic stroke. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 368 New Zealand Fellows of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. The survey included questions about the availability of hospital services for stroke patients, management of acute ischaemic stroke and opinion on the efficacy of treatments used in acute ischaemic stroke. Results: Of the 293 physicians who responded to the questionnaire, 171 managed patients in the first week after stroke. Forty-seven per cent of these physicians were general physicians. Ninety-five per cent usually managed these patients in a general medical ward. Only five physicians admitted patients to an acute stroke unit and only 57% considered acute stroke units were beneficial. Aspirin was usually or sometimes used for patients with acute ischaemic stroke by 92% of physicians, intravenous heparin by 43%, low-dose subcutaneous heparin by 41%, low-molecular-weight heparin by 25% and tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA) by 3%. Two thirds considered that aspirin was definitely beneficial, but most were uncertain about the efficacy of intravenous heparin, low-dose subcutaneous heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin and t-PA. Sixty-two per cent were prepared to begin aspirin and 21% subcutaneous heparin before computerised tomography (CT). Twenty-three per cent used anti-hypertensive treatment in the first few hours after an ischaemic stroke. Conclusions: Several common deficiencies in the management of acute ischaemic stroke were identified. The widespread lack of stroke units, use of aspirin and heparin before CT, and lowering of blood pressure after an acute ischaemic stroke differed from accepted guidelines. Many physicians used heparin despite lack of evidence from randomised trials that it is beneficial. The development of stroke units and the appointment of physicians with a special interest in the management of stroke may improve the management of patients with acute stroke.